Search

1. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by LegoFanTexas · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   What about 8129?

2. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by LegoFanTexas · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   If 8129 is the best, then it would seem to make the most sense to sell both of the prior sets and buy a new copy of 8129, they are less expensive than both of the older sets.

3. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by y2josh · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   8129 is the best of the three, but since the OP hadn't mentioned it, I didn't think to include it in the comparison.

4. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by Brick_Obsession · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   OP forgot about 8129 in his haste to do this post. Oh wait, that's me! Doh! Damn Gray Matter again... I appreciate the comments guys. I am leaning towards the 8129. Lego could make this easier for me by just creating a UCS AT-AT already :D

5. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by davee123 · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   One other thing to consider is the color change. 4483 used the old colors, while both 10178 and 8129 used the newer colors. Personally, looks-wise, I liked 4483 the most. 10178 wasn't quite as nice looking, mostly because of the walking mechanism. However, the functionality is fantastic if you're looking for more than just…

6. Re: 4483 vs 10178 AT-AT Walker

   

   Comment by monkeyhanger · October 2012 · Home› Collecting

   I think the legs on the 8129 look awful, although the head and body are probably the best of the 3. For me the 10178 is the best, the shape of the body section is way off, but I can forgive it that, and it walks (like an arthritic boxer dog).

Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?

Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon

Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com