Search

1. Re: Hobbit 2014 [Spoilers]

   

   Comment by TheOneVeyronian · January 2014 · Home› Collecting

   We're still missing #79009 in the number lineup as well - but that number might not even be assigned to anything now.

2. Re: Lord of the Rings set #9475

   

   Comment by pxchris · April 2019 · Home› Everything else LEGO

   9477 and 79009 are other gaps in the set numbers which could have in theory been originally assigned to LotR (or Hobbit) sets.

3. Re: The Hobbit 2013 Sets

   

   Comment by luckyruss · August 2013 · Home› Collecting

   We are still missing a number #79009 in between the new LOTR wave and those listed above (Goblin King has already taken #79010), if Lego has listed them sequentially by price point excluding the store exclusives (which is a regular pattern) it would enable a £12.99 set to slot in there.

4. [Germany to WW] *** LEGOPANTS' BOXED SET EMPORIUM ***

   

   Discussion by Legopants · May 2019 · Home› Marketplace

   Hello!I've got a number of boxed sets down in the man-cave and up in the loft that I'm never going to build (again) so it's time to get rid. All sets are new/unopened unless otherwise stated (photos supplied on request). With the exception of #4702 and #7623, all "used" sets were purchased new. Their boxes were opened…

   4 results

Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?

Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon

Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com