Search

11. Re: Predictions on Discontinuing Sets and their Secondary Market Value

    

    Comment by Billybrown · January 2014 · Home› Buying & Selling Topics

    Well yes 10212 was 1 set that I did go over board on, and I still have 31 if them. I feel that 10197 is a different animal altogether though and although it didnt seem logical for me to stock up on these pre-chistmas, it seems like this has been under estimated, even with the 4 year life span. Paid £80 for each of my…

12. Re: Predictions on Discontinuing Sets and their Secondary Market Value

    

    Comment by madforLEGO · October 2014 · Home› Buying & Selling Topics

    Agreed. Limited releases would be OK, IF LEGO actually enforced the limit 1/1 per person to be ONE per person. The problem is that their site is woefully outdated, or ignored, in this regard (as other sites do not seem to have an issue with limiting purchases or catching and punishing those who try to circumvent it), plus…

13. Re: Predictions on Discontinuing Sets and their Secondary Market Value

    

    Comment by madforLEGO · November 2014 · Home› Buying & Selling Topics

    What I think the general thought is that LEGO sees redoing old sets as not profitable for them. The reason why people bring up Legends is because it was a LINE of redone sets that was well hyped too, and it appears it did not sell well (Metroliners for 75 USD anyone?) -They could not remake EVERY part for part for Legends,…

Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?

Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon

Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com