Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
[IMG]http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/seonadancing/levers.jpg[/IMG]
In fact, I've long thought Lego needs to add at least two different shades of "bley" to the lineup. There is a huge gap between the lighter and darker shade.
I would like to see one in between, plus one that is lighter than the lightest color now. So we would end up with super light bley, light bley, medium bley, and dark bley.
Having those 4 colors (and not 2) to play with would instantly add greater detail/realism to a lot of MOCs.
Also, given the high cost of the levers, I personally would not hesitate to go with the black levers. I think that would fit in to the overall look of the MF rather well.
Whereas simply deleting the huge, distinctive, and iconic radar dish (to save money) would not be an acceptable approach for me.
If you can't get all the correct pieces, you need to pick and choose your substitutions/deletions carefully.
Changing interior frame colors would not bother me in the slightest. In fact, delting the yellow for bley or whatever would like be an improvement, if it is possible to see the yellow from some weird angle.
I know that the red interior bits on my SSD set annoy me! You can see them from the right angles and as to why Lego used those I have no idea. It does help a bit in the build to have the color distinction, but that benefit does not outweigh the disadvantage of being able to see bright red on an otherwise grey ship.
As for the red in the SSD... I haven't built one yet - I hope to one day buy and build it - but looking at the instruction manual online, it seemed that the red was indeed for making it easier to place things. After all you have to build quite large parts in one step, if it was all gray all the time, many would have problems differentiating what goes where and how.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lego-10179-Star-Wars-Millennium-Falcon-UCS-/160835022330?pt=UK_Construction_Toys_Kits&hash=item257283adfa
I just went there for the first time and now realize what a wonderful and powerful tool this is.
Without signing up, it allows you to create a "database" of up to 6 sets you currently own. It then asks you which Lego kit you would like to try and build from the pieces you already have. It compares parts inventories and tells you how many pieces you have, which pieces you need, and in which quantities.
It even offers suggestions for other comparable Lego kits based on a high parts match rate.
I entered the following six sets which I own and seemed like decent donor candidates: Super Star Destroyer, (newest) Millennium Falcon, UCS Darth Vader's TIE, (newest) X-wing fighter, Fire Brigade, and Town Hall.
I am obviously trying to build 10179 UCS MF.
Asking for a perfect color match of pieces (you can also choose "close" or you can ignore color matching entirely), it turns out those 6 sets give me 49.1% of the pieces needed for building 10179, which is not bad.
Other notable close matches: 10188 (Death Star) 45.5%, UCS Y-wing 44%, Death Star II 43.8%, and others, all in the 40-50% range.
So I, or anyone with these 6 donor sets, would not need to buy 100% of the parts needed to make 10179. I would need to buy about half. If we are willing to replace the gray "ratline" pieces with black, skip the bley levers, and go with a normal radar dish without the added detail, does this mean the cost for parting out half the ship would be something like $400 US or less?
That is kind of a tantalizing idea: order the missing pieces via bricklink for $400 or less, and have my own 10179 minus the instruction manual and with the stated parts substitutions.
However--there is a huge drawback here. This would result in cannibalizing six sets with a total cost of something over $1,100, plus the cost of buying the missing MF parts. This would result in the following:
I would have the UCS M.F, though with the stated substitutions. I would be out approximately $1,500, and I would also be out the 6 donor kits. In their place would be a random assortment of leftover pieces which were not needed in the UCS MF build.
You add it all up and it doesn't make any sense....unless you are willing to do this as a temporary thing. Spend the $400 to get the missing pieces, break up the 6 donor sets, and enjoy bulding the MF. Display it and have fun with it....and then re-build the 6 donor sets at a later date. The key is you would not be able to display all 7 sets at the same time.
And if what you are really after is 10179, buying those 6 donor sets (plus $400 in missing pieces) for $1,500 or so is not really the most efficient way to do it.
$1,500 will probably still get you at least a used but complete 10179.
Sorry for the long post, but I thought it was an interesting analysis. Rebrickable is a wonderful resource I will be using more often.
Do not cannibalize owned sets that are complete, especially if their aftermarket value is 2xRRP or more. Better if they were sold for market price and used to purchase their allocated parts straightforward through Bricklink. In most cases, you would be left with surplus money and not parts. Best way to get loose new parts for BL projects would be concentration on non-license/non-minifig sets that are on discount, i.e. Creator and un-popular themes/sets. You'll still have left over parts of course, but price per piece should be very low. Best way to handle this aspect is to line up multiple projects at once. You'll be able to consume over 70% of parts if the right sets are chosen. Otherwise, it might cheaper overall by simply Bricklinking the entire project from scratch than rebricking complete sets. For example, last month I BL'd the entire UCS MF for $750 with only 2 substitutions (mast rigging and 39 levers), rest were accurate (and more importantly new) parts. I was doing this along with AT-AT (8129), Vader's TIE (8088), Eiffel Tower (10181), Tumbler (7888) which all have similar parts and color. This cut down on the total number of orders and sellers, thus reducing overall shipping costs (which is not to be underestimated).
Found access to a large number of the LBG levers at about $2.50 each after delivery. I'll be ordering within this week to complete my missing 39 levers but was thinking about polling the rest of Brickset to see if anyone else is interested in joining in on the buy? If so, PM or comment here.
Back on subject. I just don't have the time to bricklink a huge undertaking as this. My time with my wife and child means more than spending countless hours trying to get every last piece I need to complete my project. I would not settle for anything less than 100% original parts. No substitutions here. The problem would be the stickers. There will become a point where all original sticker sheets from the original set will be gone. What would you do then?
$20 I think is the going rate...
I have 2 Light Bluish Gray Mast Riggings available. They are in perfect shape. Can provide a picture. If anyone is interested, shoot me a PM.
The radar was expensive but necessary. The levers were tricky but I found a way around it. But I never thought I'd find those two riggings though, so today was a good day.
Oh yea just thought I would put it out there that my 99% bricklinked Falcon is for sale. 95% of the parts are new, including boat riggings, radar dish, yellow technic angle bricks. Brand new set of instructions. Only thing not correct are the levers, mine have light bley bases with black levers.
Note: I am not trying to take away Lego's business with this idea, if TLG wants to make more of these parts, more power to them, but if they don't...
Since the patents are all long expired, simply making plastic parts should not have any legal issues that I can think of.
So the question is... If I could have copies of the light gray boat rigging produced that were close enough in quality to Lego to work with 10179, would anyone buy them? Lets say I could sell a pair of them for $49 including shipping, making them about $25 each.
Any interest?
To do this, I'd probably need to make 1,000 of them to make any sense with it, so that would be 500 sets to be sold.
Just thinking out loud...
http://www.makerbot.com/