Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
How's that for an unpopular opinion?
And that's all I will say about that.
On the other hand, I must have the minifigures in case I sell the sets in the future.
Unpopular opinion, got the Christmas GWP #40484 Santa's front yard and loved it. Built it with my daughter who really enjoyed building something a bit different and was impressed with the finished scene.
Big plus on the curved roads for Legos, but let's also stop the American vs England vs Australia stereotypes: of course there are curved roads in America. The only advantage American and Australian cities have over older European ones is that they had better understanding of city planning, so there are areas that are filled with square blocks and straight roads. But as with everywhere, obstacles and restrictions abound, creating a need for curved roads.
As I said, the parliament might have put restrictions on themselves to avoid snarky comments, but that's not applied to the common of mortals, obviously, just to those ministers and members of parliament so that things move forward.
The myth appears to have originated with an OPINION piece published by someone at the CBC (notably NOT in charge of anything related to the actual governance of Canada) talking about considering the history and wider cultural context of certain phrases and terms before you use them. The article notably don't even say that you shouldn't use the words or terms they discuss, only talking to language experts or minority advocates about why certain groups may find those terms insulting or offensive. Some of the sources they interviewed state you shouldn't use certain terms, but the writer of the article only quotes them when they do. I will grant that the article isn't particularly well written, and some of the examples are absolutely stretching, but to take that article and conflate it with a 'ban' on those words is... well. It's an interesting take. Here's the original article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/words-and-phrases-commonly-used-offensive-english-language-1.6252274
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgX6qlJEMc
And commenting on the frequent lack of common courtesies on the road.
(I gave up on correcting my children on calling a turn signal/indicator the 'blinker'.)