Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
My theme highlights of the noughties moved on quickly - I was a big Bionicle fan in the first few years, but then moved on to Knights Kingdom, Exo-Force and then of course Fantasy Castle (somewhat competing with my love of Clone Wars). However I acknowledge the fandom of Bionicle endures even when they moved into unusual minifigure hybrid sets around the Hordika era I think.
At the end of the day though, it does demonstrate that TLG opting for just one big winner was a bit of a mistake that's led to much more vitriol than needed - personally the best case scenario really would be them just turning around after the final vote and going "Surprise! All three are getting sets but the one in top position will come a bit sooner!". Just leaving it at one set is most likely gonna cause more divide and a lose-lose situation at the end of the day, whether it's Bionicle or not.
By system-based fantasy I was thinking more of Adventurers Castle, Space, Pirates, etc. Perhaps "fictional" would have been a better word.
All six toa like that plus something for them to fight would be a good set.
Why? Nostalgia. I'm hoping to vicariously relive my childhood here, and I'm gonna remain shamelessly unapologetic about that!
Do I care what wins? Not in the slightest. This has got so many people fired up about what represents LEGO best.
No single set could precisely represent what 90 years of LEGO means. It's a personal thing and nostalgia is charged with emotion. My opinion is that this is a marketing campaign and that you shouldn't take it too seriously.
Whatever does win, I'd like the eventual set to use modern techniques and new pieces to fit with the established aesthetics, not religiously, I'm cool with variation. Making something new is probably the only way to truly celebrate "LEGO" and really doing that to any of these themes will upset some people, epecially those that voted for that theme.
I say this as a someone who loves and collects LEGO, as an adult, and as a fan, even though I don't own any Bionicle and never really "got" it, if it wins, great, and if the set that is resultant from this is cool, I'll buy it.
Probably, if there isn't something else I prefer ;-)
This is one set amongst hundreds LEGO will release in the next couple of years, I'm fairly sure I'll like something.
I'll be a bit disappointed for a minute or two if there isn't a new "Classic Space" set on the horizon, but I think I'll survive that.
But such an idea no more represents LEGO'S history than Bionicle or anything else. I don't think I'd want such a set as an anniversary set either. That sort of idea sounds like a normal retail set and if LEGO thinks it will sell then it should be released as a regular retail set.
Its quite sad when people are so blinkered by their own favourite they have to belittle others to validate themselves.
Not that it really matters since we all know that only Fabuland could truly represent LEGO in such a prestigious affair.
All those are essentially theme independent and celebrate LEGO history. It is a shame they couldn't come up with something similar again.
Of course there was also this one, so I understand them not doing another microscale multi-pack just yet.
It suggests they're not really trying to define the most beloved theme so much as the most beloved aesthetic - look at how differently styled the various space subthemes are, for instance. Also, perhaps the reason they're doing this for the 90th anniversary is so they can use the insights when the 100th rolls round.
I can afford to be chill about the outcome because Ideas alone is giving me the "nostalgic but ambitious" feel I want with sets like POBB and the new Blacksmith (I may be about to fall off the "not collecting" wagon, ho-hum).
I voted a few days before the vote closed, but my vote is still in drafts waiting to be "reviewed." I am beginning to think LEGO may have capped their transparency in votes (especially since the 50k number didn't change for a few days). So there's still some unknown data, and even though this isn't the final count, I can't image the first or second positions changing too much.
But what they gain from including it as an option - and particularly, from allowing people at this stage to vote for three different things, is that they can identify what else people who like Bionicle (or any other theme/subtheme) also like. That might be the most valuable aspect of the data for them, and something not so easily extrapolated from other trends, like Ideas voting patterns.
One really noticeable trend in their in-house themes recently has been genre mashups. As derided as Nexo Knights was among AFOLs, pairing an aesthetic that nods at Ice Planet with Castle concepts was a bold choice, and presumably one they didn't make by throwing a dart at a board blindfolded. It ran for three years. And of course Ninjago is a staggeringly successful mashup of science fiction, fantasy and even modern city aesthetics. With Monkey Kid, there's a similar kind of fusion going on: Chinese mythology plus mechs. Even Hidden Side - it's a slightly retro American tinged city theme, but with monsters (always a draw).
Of course, just because I vote for Forestmen + M-Tron, it doesn't necessarily follow that what I want is Robin Hood in neon green instead of Lincoln green, robbing from the galactic rich to give to the poor beyond the rim. Some of us let our eight-year-old selves vote, and those eight-year-olds are cherry-picking themes we loved then, or wish we'd owned more of/at all. But it'd be interesting to know how peoples' votes cluster, and if it's always obviously generational nostalgia (i.e. people like me, picking subthemes from a relatively narrow period), or if there's a whole tranche of people who love Classic Space, but also Elves, say...
The intriguing thing is the popularity of Adventurers even though it’s not in the top 3. Does it mean TLG will include an Indiana Jones inspired aesthetic with a future theme and globe trotting nature? Perhaps not, though it would be nice to get a separate one off 18+ set relating to Adventurers - I feel the nods in the haunted house weren’t really sufficient for fans - fundamentally you needed to want a haunted house to buy the set, not only an interest in Adventurers. I think it’s safe to assume TLG can give a bit more focus on trains and more 18+ Trains to go with the crocodile, given their popularity.
- Bionicle wins, and TLG produce a new Bionicle set. How do they do this? Resurrected moulds or brand new ones, some kind of technic/system hybrid or a 'recreated in bricks' homage display set (like the wooden duck).
- Bionicle doesn't win, because of the cost implications, logistical challenges, design issues or perceived consumer reaction to any of the options outlined in 1. above, and Lego alienate a massive bunch of people.
- Something else?
For me, obviously I have a desire for a set from a particular theme. If I don't get one, I will probably not buy the set they do make, but I'm ok with that - there's plenty of other stuff I can buy.But for those fans of Bionicle who want that more than anything else, like, by a lot - they have nothing else that fills that void for them. There's got to be a better result than that, hasn't there?
I'd appreciate counter-arguments to this - I'm sure I'm missing things or assuming things.
The only narrowing factor TLG implemented was that the winner had to be from the top 3 shortlist. But they could always change that to expand (wishful thinking).
But I’m sure that would not be the case! Considering the theme fragmentation it could be a merger of space anyway considering the votes for Space Police and Blacktron which both have/consist of antagonists.
Every fandom is full of great people! :-)
Overall, I agree with @CCC . I am also definitely a fan of Bionicle, and would like to see it reimagined in a new way within system, but I also fully see and understand how no single theme (including Bionicle!) could possibly adequately represent a celebration of LEGO's 90th anniversary.
This event should be a fun thing - first and foremost - that LEGO has offered to fans, but it seems that because of the special context someone is going to be displeased no matter what the outcome! I hope this won't be made into some sort of debacle. Let's hope for a proper celebration!