Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
It will be interesting to see whether this reflects in the overall result after the 25th Jan. If I have more time I might return once or twice to see if the trends are the same with another 250 votes.
Adventurers needs more votes people!
Actually, yeah. you're right - which is why they need to have a Proper Go. We all know it makes sense :-)
I think those with nostalgia for Bionicle are the perfect age group for Lego Ideas and Lego fansites. I mean the theme ran from 2001 to 2010. If you use the target age group of like 8-16 then the oldest fans in 2001 would be 35 now and the youngest fans in 2010 would be 18 now. Plus I'm sure it picked up some fans from the reboot.
So let's say you've got a general age group of 18-35 for Bionicle. Pretty much every other theme most fans would be 30 years or older.
Bionicle was one of my votes. Adventurers is probably my number one but it really depends on what the final set would look like (hard to predict for Bionicle and adventurers).
Surprised to see Forestmen the most popular and wolfpack the least, while in my eyes they are pretty much the same.
In all seriousness, if bionicle wins, so be it. I see fans do some amazing builds with the parts, I'm just not a fan of the original sets (blah blah mythos don't care).
- With Bionicle in the shortlist, would TLG be willing to invest in a huge amount of bespoke Technic moulds for only one set (even then hard to tell who it would feature)? Or would they make some kind of System tribute like a bust which resembles Tahu’s mask? I don’t know if it screams ‘big Lego 90th anniversary’ to the more casual audience which TLG are often trying to attract with Ideas and its IPs
- If Trains is in the shortlist, would TLG do a non-playable Crocodile Loco style set (which they could do as 18+ anyway) or a minifigure scaled set (which they could kind of do under City anyway)?
- If Pirates is in the shortlist, they’ve already done Barracuda Bay but Imperials has far less votes - assume could be some of of Port Royal-esque docks with a smaller vessel but I feel like the options are narrowed.
I feel like I could picture a good variety of Adventurers based sets if that was in the shortlist - in my mind there is most potential for a fancy 18+ temple full of traps and playability (which I would argue is important for a 90th anniversary set).
And Bionical has never been my thing at all... so it really doesn't hold interest for me. However, I too have seen what the MOCers do with Bionical stuff and it's spectacular. So if we do end up with something in that vein, I could be OK with that.
But really, something in the Pirates, Space, Castle, or Adventurers group of themes is what I think most of us 80s kids want!
As for me, I voted for Bonkles, Rock Raiders and M-Tron - I'm not overly too fussed who gets through honestly, as long as the end result is interestingly designed enough I'm game for (nearly) anything they could end up chucking our way.
I suspect Trains will benefit a lot from that position. How 'lucky' it was up at the top eh?
(it was, wasn't it? I suddenly doubt my memory from about 5 minutes ago! Old age haha)
As I suspected Classic Space trumps any of its subthemes whilst in contrast specific themes from Castle seem to compete with the original ‘Classic’ status and cancel each other out. I also agree with @bricktuary that I suspect Trains is benefitting from a bias in the way it’s shown first as a voting option, at least on the blog entry.
I’ve looked at comments from a few other places about the vote and there are a lot of properly obsessive and very vocal Bionicle fans out there - like a cult. I could reel off many reasons why I think Adventurers deserve their spot but it’s not a ‘do or die’ situation. Even if TLG don’t want to do a Bionicle 90 year set I wonder whether the sheer number of votes is enough to make them consider a proper Constraction theme more closely?
In line with the sample @The_Rancor looked at, Bionicle has the top spot.
Not much point in me doing any more samples now - I kind of liked the guessing nature of it as anything still stood a chance, but we’ll have to see if anything changes between now and the end of voting.
Pirates, Trains and Adventurers are clearly battling it out for the 3rd spot in the list, though I might have to abandon hope that Adventurers makes it now, which is very disappointing considering the other 2 themes have had plenty of attention in recent sets and reboots.
If the ‘final’ winning set is themed on either Classic Space or Pirates I’ll definitely be buying it. Bionicle and Trains I’m not so sure ahead of time but it would depend on the size and design.
I'm most definitely not a Bionicle fan, so perhaps someone else can chime in... Did Bionicle have sub-themes as well? Brickset lists some, but not sure how applicable that is...
Comparing what I've got to the chart, my analysis was decent: (from high to low) Pirates, Bionicle, Adventurers, Space Police, Classic Space, and trains. Obviously Adventurers and Space Police are really further down the list, so I must have hit a few streaks of votes.
1. Classic Space
2. Rock Raiders
3. Adventurers (Jungle theme)
I feel that adventurers really captures the heart of LEGO exploration. If LEGO were to create a AFOL themed Adventures set, I think the Jungle would be the most detailed option.
Generally they would alternate waves of heroes and then villains. You could kind of split things up into subthemes, but generally speaking you had a shift with each year, with one combo of heroes and villains.
I guess they'd be subthemes? Would be kind of weird to split them up though. It's sort of like Ninjago's various settings: One cohesive theme that changes setting each year or so.
I voted for Black Falcons, Forestmen, and Imperials, so if you lump the first two into the "castles" theme, I would have only voted 1x for those if they were combined. I would have voted 1x for "pirates" (noting a preferred sub theme of Imperials). I'm not sure what my 3rd vote would have been.
I suspect there weren't a TON of votes that were 3x all within the same broad theme (e.g. "castles"). Surely there were more than zero though. Even if everybody who voted for any of the castles themes voted 3x for castle themes, that's still 11,000 unique voters casting a vote for "castle".
I also suspect that if the themes were set up in this broader way, "Castle", "Space", and "Pirates", then the front-runners would be (in this order: Castle, Space, Bionicle, Pirates. I think the gap between Castle and Space would be larger than between Space and Pirates.
Edit: I looked at the theme list again. I would have probably voted Castle (Forestmen), Pirate (Imperial), Space (Monorail).
There, I fixed it ;)
Sort of like the 1990 70th Birthday set of Godtfred Kirk Christiansen... lots of people will want to own it... but no one will want to play with it... ;-)
If TLG did a set each based on the top 6 themes in the latest email I doubt many people would have any reason to complain at all. It’s just that fan preferences are fragmented - which isn’t helped by partial or failed attempts at reviving some of the themes available to choose from.
It’s likely still exacerbated too by TLG’s recent focus on themes like Ninjago and away from their core themes like Space, Pirates and Castle (I’m sure with market research that to some degree backs up this decision). Particularly adult fans are desperate to get something from one of the themes that feels like it’s been neglected or forgotten in recent years. Bionicle isn’t in a good position in those terms compared to some of TLG’s (previously so called) ‘evergreen’ themes because it did have a full on revival theme-wise that just didn’t do very well.