Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I like the set, but $200 is at least $50 too much for me. I know that the Power Functions components are expensive, but it still seems too costly.
Edit: The press release also notes the use of some of their new plant sourced plastic. I suppose that could be a factor in the higher cost, along with the large rock pieces in green and what appears to be printing as opposed to stickers, plus the printing on the mini-figures, but the cost still seems rather high.
“This set includes a spruce tree manufactured from sustainably sourced plant-based plastic!”
A spruce tree?! One? There appear to be three in the set.
Also disappointed it's PF powered rather than PUP, but I guess the components don't exist yet for them to convert it over (Namely, a battery box that turns on and goes without a Bluetooth controller).
So it's not cheap, but sets with PF usually aren't.
As far as I'm aware this has come out of the blue - I'm not seen any rumours about a re-release of this. One thing is for sure though, lots of show displays are going to start sprouting 1m high turbines!
Yes. Of course.
[thats what she said...]
I imagine demand for the olf one was down to rarity rather than subject.
This is a nice set but the price is ridiculous. The Saturn Apollo,which is arguably far more impressive,did cost 130. And then this should be 180?
Also not sure why they did include a power function,maybe make it suited for a power function without it having to come with the set.
While the battery box is not necessary for the power-generating function and can't really store the power created (dang, wouldn't it be awesome if it could, though?), I suspect that's to make the lights and movement part of the set's display value rather than just its play value. Whether you have the set on a shelf or as part of a larger layout the powered lights and spinning blades give it more appeal than it would have as just a static sculpture.
Of course, that's all in reference to the original. For the re-release, there's the added factor of just staying as authentic as possible to the original set save for branding updates and minor part substitutions.
The small cottage reminded me of those small houses Lego used to make in the 1980s - similar in style. It was a nice bit of nostalgia.
Anyway, the reason for my post is some of the building techniques are not what I'd call robust, but have not been mentioned on any of the main fan sites.
The housing for the motor on top of the pole is a flimsy design. The sides only have connections at the front half meaning they are visibly detached at the back. The top which is where the rear hatch is attached to, is also connected at the front half only so collapses into the housing with only a slight bit pressure - securing a minifig onto the top back for example requires you to open the hatch and hold the top from underneath. There is a technic pin to prevent rotating the turbine 360 degrees, but again doslodges too easily.
The weight on the baseplate is mainly at the back (the turbine) so the baseplate bends a bit too much when lifting. It is best lifted using the pole, actually it has a very secure connection to the base.
Finally! The wiring through the kitchen for the front lights is hidden marvellously.
So yes, it looks tremendous but the fly in he ointment is the motor housing which isn't up the excellent engineering standards we usually see in Lego sets.
Had to be like this before it was packaged as the outer box was entirely undamaged.