LEGOwhacks

Comments

• ricecake Maryland, USAMember Posts: 879

  January 2018

  I thought you were talking about #42072. That set is WHACK!
  

  

  1
• elspankdog TexasMember Posts: 403

  January 2018

  3958 in aqua, 33291 in violet...what do I win?

  

  1
• CCC UKMember Posts: 19,557

  January 2018

  Not much, as both parts are only in one set each (according to BL), the set that they are both in. Parts like that are easy to find. For example, there are about 20 parts that only appear in the new UCS Falcon, so all of those pairs only occur in one set too. Similarly, most CMFs will have a pair of parts appearing in just one set. The idea is to find two relatively common parts that only appear together in one set. The more common the better (so a higher score).
  
  

  

  1
• elspankdog TexasMember Posts: 403

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  I see.  We want a high score.  Totally missed that part (literally)

  0
• CCC UKMember Posts: 19,557

  January 2018

  
  Here's a new high score:
  
  http://www.spoofdata.com/setfinder/?id1=4220634&id2=4211349&id3=&id4=&id5=
  
  
  
  4220634 in 81 sets
  4211349 in 146 sets,
  
  so a score of 81.
  
  There must be a 100+ score ...
  

  

  2
• elspankdog TexasMember Posts: 403

  January 2018

  Seems like the CMF base would be easy picking, but I'm not sure Brickset has the set total correct for that part.  It should be 400 sets, but Brickset counts an entire series line as one set.  A set like #21307 that uses that base as a regular part should have a combination with another 400+ part

  0
• Paperballpark Near ManchesterMember Posts: 4,003

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  Right, now I get the point of this (to get the highest score from a combination which only appears in one set), I've kinda smashed it.
  
  4164022, in 155 sets, and 302302, in 202 sets, but only together in #7133, for a Legowhack of 155
  
  http://www.spoofdata.com/setfinder/?id1=4164022&id2=302302&id3=&id4=&id5=
   
  
  However, what are the specific rules here about having to check using that website? Because 656202 (246 sets) and 4211568 (218 sets) appeared together in #9665 according to Brickset, but for some reason that comparison website says they didn't, which is odd. If it's allowable, which I think it is, that's a Legowhack of 218.
  
  http://www.spoofdata.com/setfinder/?id1=4211568&id2=656202&id3=&id4=&id5=
   
  So I think the above two in #9665 currently hold the high score, at 218. :)

  

  3
• MAGNINOMINISUMBRA Member Posts: 993

  January 2018

  Nice to open the topic to see everyone playing nice! The title was...shall we say, somewhat disturbing?

  0
• Fauch FranceMember Posts: 2,520

  January 2018

  #4219615 16 * 32 green base plate (brickset says 26 sets, but I count 72 on bricklink)
  and 
  4211435  1 * 4 arch in light blueish grey (81 sets)
  
  they both only appear in 10218 pet shop
  http://www.spoofdata.com/setfinder/?id1=4219615&id2=4211435&id3=&id4=&id5=
  

  0
• Astrobricks Minnesota, USMember Posts: 3,947

  February 2018

  MAGNINOMINISUMBRA said:

  Nice to open the topic to see everyone playing nice! The title was...shall we say, somewhat disturbing?

  I just thought they meant #42072

  0