Brickset ForumShopping at LEGO or Amazon?
Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Lego Shaak Ti (Referring to quality issues and asking collectors about their favorite print variant)
SmartArmoredMachine
Member Posts: 29
in Collecting
I was interested in people's thoughts on the difficulty of finding a superb condition Lego Shaak Ti minifigure with a nice clean print (Referring namely to the headdress). Has anyone has seen a Shaak Ti minifigure that was graded (By the AFA ect.)? If so what is the highest grade Shaak Ti minifigure you have seen? In my search for the perfect Shaak Ti, I have only been able to find two really good condition ones and am now the proud owner of one with a near perfect print (It is truly a sight to behold). I would be curious to see some of the things people have found out regarding print variations and which ones look better from the front, sides, back, and overall. Lastly, does anyone know where LEGO manufactured the Shaak ti headdress as condition issues are so rampant I am starting to consider collecting good condition figures simply for their preservation. Thanks for your interest in this rather odd topic and I look forward to your comments below.
~~~
The general knowledge I have discovered about the Shaak Ti figure that offers explanations as to why it is very hard to find in good condition(Namely referring to the headdress) [Please add anything else you think to be of note in the comments]:
(I am relatively sure that there was no protective plastic bag around the headdress [As seen with the variant included with the star wars rebels Ahsoka figure.] which could have resulted in damage caused by rough handling of the original packaging especially considering that the plastic used in the production of this part is more of a soft plastic and is thus susceptible to damage(Namely to the printing).)
(I have heard information [None supported by any irrefutable evidence, or more accurately any evidence.] that Shaak Ti's headdress was made by a facility in China, which would explain a lot of the condition issues, but I believe we would see much more severe problems if this were the case. Any information on this would be interesting to discuss, but please support your claims.)
(The intricacy of the headdress print [Namely in regards to the three colors and multiple uneven surfaces] is what I believe to be the name cause of the more notable issues regarding print fidelity as if the item were to be slightly off during or after any print cycle it increases the likelihood of the print not looking very good at places where multiple colors meet, which is one of the reasons I am happy with the one I was able to acquire as at the areas where multiple colors meet it is a quite clean union.)
(I will restate in its own section that printing on the soft plastic could have resulted in the rather severe issues you see with the printing being very susceptible to wear.)
~~~
I appreciate any comments and discussions that sprout from this topic and look forward to everyone's opinion, also please share photos of the best condition Shaak Ti figures you have seen or that you own.
In close, if anyone is interested in photos of the different prints and various pros and cons of ones I have encountered just ask and I will try to provide what information I can.
~~~
The general knowledge I have discovered about the Shaak Ti figure that offers explanations as to why it is very hard to find in good condition(Namely referring to the headdress) [Please add anything else you think to be of note in the comments]:
(I am relatively sure that there was no protective plastic bag around the headdress [As seen with the variant included with the star wars rebels Ahsoka figure.] which could have resulted in damage caused by rough handling of the original packaging especially considering that the plastic used in the production of this part is more of a soft plastic and is thus susceptible to damage(Namely to the printing).)
(I have heard information [None supported by any irrefutable evidence, or more accurately any evidence.] that Shaak Ti's headdress was made by a facility in China, which would explain a lot of the condition issues, but I believe we would see much more severe problems if this were the case. Any information on this would be interesting to discuss, but please support your claims.)
(The intricacy of the headdress print [Namely in regards to the three colors and multiple uneven surfaces] is what I believe to be the name cause of the more notable issues regarding print fidelity as if the item were to be slightly off during or after any print cycle it increases the likelihood of the print not looking very good at places where multiple colors meet, which is one of the reasons I am happy with the one I was able to acquire as at the areas where multiple colors meet it is a quite clean union.)
(I will restate in its own section that printing on the soft plastic could have resulted in the rather severe issues you see with the printing being very susceptible to wear.)
~~~
I appreciate any comments and discussions that sprout from this topic and look forward to everyone's opinion, also please share photos of the best condition Shaak Ti figures you have seen or that you own.
In close, if anyone is interested in photos of the different prints and various pros and cons of ones I have encountered just ask and I will try to provide what information I can.
0
Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?
Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 16.2K General
- 3 Announcements
- 3.1K Collecting
- 3.7K Everything else LEGO
- 1.7K Building and Techniques
- 2.3K Brickset
- 14 Ambassador
- 1K Introduce yourself
- 385 The Database
- 438 Brickset.com
- 316 Forum Operation
- 15 FAQs
- 13.9K Shopping
- 1.7K Shopping USA/Canada
- 337 Shopping Elsewhere
- 11K Marketplace
- 1.2K Other
- 571 Community and Events
- 262 Photography/Video
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
Why would the headdress being made in China explain the condition issues? Condition (concerning scratching / print issues) of parts like this made in China is (and was at the time) usually very good. I also thought all parts like this made in China were bagged. Parts being individually bagged was a clear sign they were Chinese made (at least at the time, I don't know now).
This thread might be of use:
http://bricksetforum.com/discussion/14587/how-to-determine-where-a-part-is-made
I will admit that the two most likely explanations for how common the damage is are that the part was not in a bag and parts scratched them during transport, or simply that they were not able to stand up to play although if that were the case I would expect to see more good condition ones from adult collectors with ones that are listed as new.
Anyone have an open box sealed bags 7931 (T-6 Jedi Shuttle) they can check if the Shaak Ti headdress was bagged for us?...I begin to get tempted to bother an eBay seller for this information...
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/49583-review-7931-t-6-jedi-shuttle/
In the original post you say "please support your claims" yet you don't support this claim. I don't believe it is more common for parts made in China to "have issues" than parts made elsewhere. These sorts of parts are not made elsewhere, so you are not comparing like with like. Some people don't like the different feel of the Chinese plastic (and some do), but that is not a print quality issue.
Sometimes prints are poor, but they tend to fail quality control and do not get put into sets. For example:
Occassionally mistakes are made and low quality pieces do escape, but these are rare.
I imagine the print is easier to damage on that headgear because the print is on a softer rubber-like plastic rather than ABS.
If you cannot discount playwear, then it sounds like you have been buying used figures or parts. Have you tried asking a BL seller of a new figure (or the headgear part) if the headgear is new and still bagged? That will ensure you get a factory fresh part.
All of my Star Wars figs are from new boxes. Unique ones are built, put on a CFMF baseplate, and placed in my enclosed display case. They're essentially as good as new.
I'm not really seeing anything that stands out enough on this headpiece to seem like a problem, or see anything about its imperfections that's significantly different relative to the average figure, so I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about. At least, without your pictorial examples to accompany your description.
The red squares are the main points that I have seen damage on the headdress. This is expectable on used items as these areas are going to be quite susceptible to play wear, but I have seen an unfortunate amount of issues on new/like new (Display) items in these areas. (I believe I saw some chips/wear on these areas in drdesignz photos.)
The yellow squares are areas where I have found print fidelity issues to be woefully common.
Lastly, the green squares are an area where there is a common print variation on the right side (Red arrow) where it is not level with the left side, or if it is level there is a resulting print variation that alters the level of the blue line that touches the first tooth on the headdress on the front of the part.
In close LEGO has greatly improved Togruta printing on this part with the latest Ashoka minifigure from the Rebels series, but I have a growing interest in collecting new condition Shaak Ti figures simply for their preservation.
Remember that these are (heavily) printed rubberised parts, still quite rare for Lego. They decide they are good enough quality for what they are and that this is still the best way to make such parts. They might be able to do a less detailed moulded modified head instead in more rigid plastic, but they choose to use the more detailed rubberised part. If they had the right equipment in a European factory, they could make the same thing there. But it would be of the same quality.
I think Lego accepts that their products should be as durable as possible but compromises are made, whether it is using stickers, not printing some parts, fewer colours in print, etc. Of course, it is a toy not a collectors' brand, and played with toys are expected to get scratched or damaged, be it the print or broken hands or cracked arms. And new toys are not expected to have absolutely perfect print no matter what AFOLs want.