Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
Wonder what Lego's mark up is on each set?
... it's a TRAP!
- answer: it actually does but not sure that's a good thing because it means I have to be the sensible one.
I really think it looks stunning, but severely lacking in minifigures. Don't own the old one but love the detail like the hallways, the greebling. And a Mynoc :)
Not going to buy it though, unless money situation changes in the next couple of years and it's still available then. I know compared to how much older ones were going for the price isn't that bad but it's almost a months mortgage and so many other cool sets to get.
Still, I think it looks great and fun for those of you who can afford it and don't have the old one.
I was so excited after watching the designer video though and am glad I didn't peak at pictures before the official reveal. Enjoyed this thread as well. Thanks!
there all fake looking to scam people. if some one had got there hands on some to sell now... then thay would have poped up well over a week ago people who clam to have them now dont give a cow about selling before press statement. not one of them show a non lego made image of the set.
Also lol to me I obviously cant reach my hand out and hold a phone still at the same time. The real thing is less blurry in real life and touching it is like touching a boob for the first time expect more bumpy.
UCS falcon rumours (that turned out to be true!)
Speaking of bumpy, I'm off to build BB8.
These new Lego sets really are good. :)
"How come, 20 years ago, nobody ever made a fuss out of paying a RRP of 120-140 buck for a less than 300 parts LEGO set?"
Answer: Because it was awesome and it looked gigantic in 1997!
(Price per part ratio? What do you mean? Who cares, it's a cool spaceship!!)
also it's a bloody awesome Set.
swosh it around Man! Swosh IT! and you got to see it in the dark man....
https://www.facebook.com/DevidVII/posts/2201474393439716
I bought a BB8 while I was there, of course ;)
I thought they looked awesome as a kid, especially 6975 Alien Avenger. It was one of the first flying saucer sets that really matched the iconic image I'd grown up with, and I swear it was on my Christmas list for two years straight. When I got it, though, it didn't hold my attention long. Maybe it just wasn't as exciting as previous favorite themes of mine like Aquazone were, maybe I was at a fickle age, or maybe I was just getting to the age where I needed something more challenging like Technic to really hold my interest, but UFO stands out to me as one of those themes that was cooler to me in concept than in execution. Which was something of a trend among late 90s themes.
I don't think it's a bad thing that people's standards are higher today than in the 90s, but I agree that price per piece can be a misleading value metric especially among sets that use a lot of bigger pieces. Do we know how much the new Falcon actually weighs compared to other Star Wars sets? That could better tell us how much volume of bricks it has.