Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I can see why they would but to be honest I think it needs the complexity and detail - thats this set's hook, and to my mind this is the first set without a very obvious hook (others have had IPs (inc Nasa), games and feminism). This is for the detailed model/modular crowd and simplifying it to the level of a standard creator or winter village set would kill it.
They have made massive changes to sets from the projects to sets before, the original Delorean might have been a similar scale but was definitely shrunk down a little for the set (https://ideas.lego.com/projects/96) the Ecto-1 was originally a project featuring the Firehouse and Ecto-1 (despite the fact that there was a project in the same review that was just for the ecto-1 - https://ideas.lego.com/projects/36088) and anyone remember what the original mine craft project looked like - it was minifig scale and pretty poor compared to the recent minifig scale sets (https://ideas.lego.com/projects/4038)
As ever I think with anything from Ideas a certain amount of expectation management is necessary. It would be crazy for LEGO to change the design too much on this kind of project, but it's not beyond the realm of possibility.
I expect one of two outcomes for this project: A moderately pared-down version (e.g. simplified and slightly less detail) with ~1500 pieces at $150, or a version close to the original with ~2000 pieces at $200.
Changes, yes, but massive changes? Minecraft is probably the only one that can be described as such, and I don't think it's relevant.
I'm also voicing this a little bit based on just how much whining occurred about he use of barrels instead of wheels on the Exo-Suit. To me that was a trivial change but here and on other LEGO sites some people were saying thing like it completely ruins the set.
While the project doesn't appeal to me at all the fact that it passed review is potentially good as it opens the scope for what else might come from ideas, but if it sells poorly it could have completely the opposite effect. That's why I personally am not expecting the final set to look exactly like the fan model, I just think it's a safer way to approach it to avoid disappointment.
That's not to say "projects based on current themes are a no-go", because if that were the case it wouldn't be hard for LEGO to just make a rule against it and save people the disappointment. But it is a risk to bear in mind. In the case of discontinued themes like Exo-Force or Avatar: The Last Airbender it shouldn't be a concern.
Still not sure I'd get it as I'm not a big Beatles fan. My wife is, *except* for 1 album: Yellow Submarine Songtrack...
Thanks again @Huw!
The creator donated the instructions to Creations for Charity and can be purchased through their Bricklink shop http://www.bricklink.com/store/home.page?p=C4C#/shop?o={"q":"johnny"}
LEGO Ideas - A Holiday Update
#21308 - Adventure Time (26th December, 2016)
#XXXXX - Apollo 11 Saturn V (Expected Mid-2017)
#XXXXX - Old Fishing Store (Expected Fall 2017)
Source: https://ideas.lego.com/blogs/1-blog/post/110
For example, I keep forgetting that the Saturn V rocket is supposed to be getting released.
They also mention in pretty much every video that their designers are working hard on redesigning the fan model to meet their standards/techniques. It wouldn't surprise me if they were doing pre-lim work when projects reached 5K.
The prelim thing would surprise me. Aren't there projects that reach 5K but do not reach 10,000? I think I'd believe that statement after the 10K mark but prior to announcement. But I have no idea how TLG allocates any of its resources. Not that I wouldn't love to know mind you...but that's a pipe dream of all pipe dreams. I'm way too old to get the knowledge I need to try to have TLG be the last product development job in my career. But I do hope that I'm not too old that I can't one day have enough know how to submit a couple of ideas to the site.
I'd also think well in advance as a number of ideas are nearing 10k that they already know what will and won't make it to shelves.
Apollo is going to be difficult as I'd say it is designed as a show piece but you'll always get the people wanting to swoosh it and I can't blame them.
With some of the issues we've seen Lego want to avoid having to release fix kits.
Twelve models have made it to the review phase:
- Boat Repair Shop (by RobenAnne)
Congratulations to all and good luck!Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. "The Bus" LEGO Set (by Savath_Bunny)
Hulkbuster UCS (by Raychow)
Lego Store Modular Version (by )kashaka
Red Dwarf Lego (by )Legobob32
Landrover 4 x 4 (by Dadandlad)
Volkswagen Golf MK1 GTI (by hasskabal)
Vintage Tram (by kevinszeto)
1950's Diner (pix027)
Ship In A Bottle, The Flagship Leviathan. (by JakeSadovich77)
UCS Rey´s Speeder (by Robert Lundmark)
The Iron Giant (by BrettCuv)
<_< >_>
I dunno. No obvious winner here
1, 4 & 9: too similar to the 'old fishing store' so unlikely
2 & 3: licensing issues, or 'too similar to existing themes'
6 & 7: too similar to the Caterham released recently
5: too adult (frequent references to sex, alcohol etc)
8: hmm, no train/tram models so far, so maybe this might make the cut?
10, 11 & 12 - built method/structural integrity issues? Esp. with Iron Giant's size and narrow legs.
The others are too close to recently approved Ideas submissions or are unlikely because of licensing.