Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
that said, I don't see them putting out another ones I soon after 10240
When you compare #7140 with #9493, the level of quality and accuracy is worlds apart. But when you compare #7191 with #10240, many of the improvements are much subtler, and there are even some aspects like the sharpness of the nose where a person might understandably prefer the original.
I was hoping to do the double up with that and the poster when I run down to my local store after work.
I'll just keep a better eye on dates next time.
Wouldn't that make the Detective's Office the lone modular building? I don't think so.
I could understand if #10218 Pet Shop was 'Sold Out', as that has been available for nearly 4 years, but both Palace and Parisian should have at least 2 more years each.
Add in the general periodic klutziness of [email protected] website and I think you have full reason to not panic.
Hello all... just thought I'd drop by and say hi... older post I'm quoting, but catching up on the reading...
I think CheshireCat is correct, LEGO probably cares less about resellers than resellers think they do, right up until it disrupts their business. Buying up stuff at the end of life, when demand is low, probably doesn't bother them nearly as much as buying up all the freshly launched Batman Tumblers and making it hard to get for end users.
And frankly, I don't blame them. If I were LEGO, that would bother me too.
---
Perhaps resellers can be put into two camps (there is crossover, but this is just a simple example):
1. Resellers who buy freshly launched sets for the quick flip while they are new and hard to find due to launch demand.
2. Resellers who buy for the long term, sets near EOL to hold for a year or two and then sell to collectors long after it is gone from the LEGO catalog.
---
Personally I've always been the latter, #2. The quick flip can have quick profits, but it is a lot of work and you run the risk of holding inventory that becomes common before you sell. It also strikes me as a scummy thing to do, rather like buying up all the Furbies before Christmas and selling them for triple on eBay.
A few years ago I had several dozen DS stashed away, but finally sold them all because for whatever gains I might have gotten, money tied up for 5 years is a poor return in most cases.
Now it looks like it may be going out and I don't have any of them saved. But that's ok, the money I reclaimed from the DS has been reinvested several times over.
I generally like to sell sets 1 year post retirement, give or take. Sometimes the price rise comes in 6 months, sometimes it takes longer, but if I can flip my whole stock on average once a year, I'm happy with that.
Dammit, I knew I waited too long to grab that Star Accessories set!
This is precisely the time to panic.
Nonetheless, I don't like being told I'm wrong. In the current common usage, entrapment is distinguishable as a term relating to criminal law. There may have been some older definition that has a wider meaning, and perhaps my perspective is myopic, but...
http://thelawdictionary.org/entrapment/
I think you're confusing entrapment with being defrauded or deceived or bamboozled. Some of which can be illegal (subject to jail or criminal penalties), a tort (subject to civil or administrative penalties) or perfectly legal (subject to karma or one's maker). One cannot be entrapped into a bad marriage. They can be defrauded, but certainly not entrapped.
Plus, Sean Connery said so, 1:16 into the clip:
"Entrapment is what cops do to thieves."
(BTW, this was just an excuse to referrence a Sean Connery quote from a forgettable movie.)
Here is the "regular folk" definition of entrapment:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entrapment
It uses the marriage example in the webster definition.
From a medical perspective entrapment is the constriction of a vessel or nerve:
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/entrapment
So you and @juggles7 are both right, and wrong according to doctors. ;)
I would not want the police involved in a bowel entrapment.
But Sean Connery is never wrong.
So @SumoLego, by that definition, one can entrap someone in a bad marriage. :)
Death Star
Pet Shop
Kwik E Mart
Palace Cinema
Parisian Restaurant
Ideas - Birds
Very strange, got to be a website error......?????
At least we can now start talking about how much it will rise and have endless debates on that instead of when it would EOL.
It would be so much easier if the company were just to give their employees real bonuses, real benefits, real raises, rather than tempt them with discounted collectibles they are only allowed to fondle or display, but not to convert into much-needed cash, under penalty of termination.
Not many non-retired sets go for that kind of markup.