Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
(Although I don't think either figure is exclusive.)
Did you calculate these by hand, because Brckpicker is still only reporting up to April? Thanks
Plus that's a lot of companies they would need to get into contact with for licenses.
Sorry for the random off-topic to everyone else.
I quite disagree, not only because I myself have ADHD and have plenty of nostalgia for my old toys (the term "ADHD generation" is kind of offensive to boot), but also because we're seeing interests traditionally associated with childhood becoming more and more acceptable for adults, and I expect that trend to continue. Being an AFOL is already a lot more mainstream than it used to be, and I see no reason why it would become LESS mainstream in the years to come.
The only way I see this posing a big risk to resellers in the long run is if more and more kids, deprived of the stigma against adults playing with LEGO, do not go through a "dark age" at all and choose to hold onto their childhood LEGO sets. People in that category (which I would fall into) would not need to "buy back" their childhood because they would have held onto it.
We're not at that point on a wide scale yet, though, especially since a lot of the kids who are becoming adults are not in the financial situation to reject reselling childhood toys as a potential source of income (or as a way to free up valuable space for other interests). Just within the BIONICLE fan community I've already seen a lot of people letting go of their old collections, and likewise a lot of people trying to either buy back sets they've parted with or buy sets they missed out on in the first place.
Even when I was a kid, though, I was a bit like that, jumping from one interest to another and always being interested in what's current. I loved themes like Aquazone and Ninja at their launch, then didn't really care enough to buy more than one set from each subsequent wave. Still, that didn't stop some of those themes from continuing to resonate with me even after I'd moved on from them. It's not just about how long you enjoy something, it's about how passionately you enjoy it, how deeply you immerse yourself in it, etc.
The LEGO Group of course knows that kids are always interested in something new, and that's a big part of why they introduce new themes on a regular basis, and try to keep their long-term themes fresh with new storylines, settings, and gimmicks. So I don't think there's too much worry about kids being in a huge rush to move on from LEGO entirely — not so long as there's always some LEGO toy that's new and different than what they just moved on from. If kids were aging out of LEGO much more quickly than they used to I doubt the LEGO Group would be doing so well financially!
I will admit that I was probably not a "normal" kid even for when I grew up. Growing up, it felt to me like all my friends were jumping from one interest to another too quickly for me to keep track of! And I don't have the most firsthand experience with younger generations. But I think that even though an outside observer can easily assume a kid isn't really interested in something when they move on from it in a year or so, you never know which of those things they will continue to remember fondly ten years later.