Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
My second thought is that it could be a Bricklinked set.
Does it have the original Lego printed instructions? If not, I would say it is BL'd. I would check to see if it has the correct white panels here: http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=2362b
Those same dark red bricks were used in Pet Shop and could have come from that.
People were very excited when they saw Pet Shop would have 2 dark red slopes since it meant that the pieces were being produced again, but they ended up being a noticeably different shade, likely an unintentional result of color variation of the dye. That is what is being called "new dark red".
So, without seeing a photo of the color variation, if you are seeing two distinct colors, it sounds like the rarer Cafe Corner slopes were substituted with newer ones.
As for what to do, your options seem to be:
1) Procure additional original "dark red" for a complete set of 36
2) Procure additional "new dark red" for a complete set of 36. Divulge that they have been replaced for uniformity
3) Divulge knowledge of color variation when selling
The list is ordered from most difficult/highest selling price -> least difficult/lower selling price.
It was the first set I really noticed the problem. The other ones were the ninjago fire temple and a second creator log cabin (original/first one was fine) where the browns varied in colour. Maybe I am just looking more carefully but these pieces are more common than they were 4 years ago. Also, they all seem to have poorer clutch power.
Although I cannot say for certain, I had no other indication that it had been bricklinked and had always thought it to be an original complete set. I wonder if some factory batches used a mixture as Lego do not differentiate between the two?
Also, this has come up for discussion on Brickset previously here:
http://www.bricksetforum.com/discussion/8745/wanted-part-4541382
They use (at least) three different part numbers: 4267279, 4541382 and 4623597, although the Design ID remains the same.
It makes sense to use a different part number if the mould changes, even if the part is nominally the same. There are also differences other than the stud type - the internal ridges are different, for example, making it easier/harder to fit a single stud centrally in the bottom. Changes sometimes influence whether a particular piece can be used in a particular situation and it wouldn't be much good to have a few million of a certain brick in stock and not know whether it can be used for a new set.
On the other hand, most of the time it's possible to use anything with the same Design ID, and some sets will have a mixture. What I tend to find, though, is that most of the bricks are the same with just one or two that are slightly different. If you tracked how they were packed in the bags, you might find that different bags were sourced from different batches. In any other situation you'd expect bricks from the same production run (and therefore from the same mould and of the same colour) to tend to stay together.
A 20/16 mix for these bricks in CC suggests that it's not (all) original. I don't know how they're bagged, but as they're all used in the roof it's reasonable to expect that they'd all be in the same bag. Or half in each of two identical bags. That wouldn't give the mix here.
I've seen color variations elsewhere. It supposedly has to do with the dye and plastic changes they went with. Something about color pellets or they switched from using them? And bricks are more translucent than they used to be.
LEGO is cutting costs so they can stay profitable I'm sure.
I do believe each time they have a new mold created, the similar piece will then have a new element ID number. Look at dark blue 1x2x8 arch from CC and winter village market. Same piece, but different numbers because the mold is actually different. They have been reinforcing the underside of the arches for quite some time, so you can "rebuild" old sets, but they aren't identical to the original production run. But most people wouldn't be aware of that.
Another common example is the difference in yellow coloration in technic beams, even in the same set.
It was probably around 2009, so I guess it's possible that a mix could have been in some CC sets.
My CC definitely had the older colour.
The older pieces are brighter and more translucent than the newer dark red.
Of course, due to slightly suspect quality control, there are variations in each of these varieties too, which I believe is worse in the older variant.
I store my old dark red and new dark red pieces separately.
Note also that you should search for 4460* on bricklink, which will show that there are 8 sets that had one or other type in dark red: 4460, 4460a or 4460b
Go for the completely open studs if you want the older dark red, since all mine have completely open studs, with the moulding mark on the vertical face.
All my new dark red have hollow studs, with the moulding mark inside the stud.
What you could do is to source some more slopes to ensure yours are all the same shade. I have had a look on Bricklink and there is a large quantity of these slopes available in the USA. Part 4460b on Bricklink will be the later variant. Part 4460a will be the older one and will doubless cost more. These parts are sought after and are priced accordingly.
This part in Dark Red was re-released 2 years ago in set 41075 and the part is still available from Lego Bricks & Pieces.
I asked on eb weather the gg set uses new or old dark red for curtains, but got no answer. the easiest way to tell is by looking through the brick towards a light source. Light will shine through the old red plastic.
In theory, that would mean that Green Grocer originally should have had parts in Dark Red, not New Dark Red.
Then life gets complicated.
TLG changing the name on the colour palette may or may not have coincided with the change of colour. Even if it did, were later sets produced using bricks that had been made before the colour change. And if not, what does "later" mean? An early set might've had Dark Red parts; a later one New Dark Red; or perhaps they're all nominally the same - but which?
The colour is unique in that the name changed, but the colour ID remained the same. TLG sometimes discontinue a colour and create a new one, but they haven't renamed any other colour.
As a guess, I wonder whether the colour didn't "change" - and why nobody ever has answers for what happened. Before you totally dismiss that comment because it's obviously not true, consider that it seems there have always been issues in maintaining the colour consistency of Dark Red - essentially, it isn't one colour but a whole load of them. Was New Dark Red therefore just another one (albeit unfortunately noticeably different), but the name was changed because a new method was used to obtain that colour in the hope of obtaining consistency in the future? In other words, would it have been more appropriate to call it "Stable Dark Red" or something similar. Whether or not TLG achieved that is a totally different issue, but it might explain why the name changed but not the ID in that it's supposed to be the same colour.
Of course, TLG (and therefore Brickset) now use "New Dark Red" for older sets simply because the former generally shows the current equivalents.