Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
RRP: A fixed price point at which you can/could buy a set from retailers
New: Basically an unopened set
Used: Basically an opened set
Any set, used or new can appreciate above RRP, depending on condition, completeness, etc. and what the market is willing to pay for it.
A used set will never even come close to the same value of the same new set.
Example: Emerald Night was $100 RRP. You can easily get more than that for a used set right now. You can get WAY more than that for a new set. No matter how well you take care of your "used" Emerald Night, it will never be more valuable than a "new" one in a sealed box.
I sell in norway and the uk.
I am not confusing people thinking of reselling. The OP has bought one set. He can either keep it sealed or play with it. But what price will he get 3 years down the line is unknown. But he could get more than he paid even if he played with the set. So he wont loose anything that was my point. If he knew the market you now what to buy.
When someone says a general statement such as 'I find people will pay more for used lego than new...', the interpretation is this:
'I can get more for a used Town hall than if I sold a new town hall (MISB) at the same time, regardless of time in production'. I doubt this is possible, and if so, you are finding gullible people and I have a few Death stars Id like to sell them then, heck I'll even break the seals and build it once so it can get that increased 'used' value :-)
Now if you are saying that eventually a used retired set will sell better than its MSRP when it was out, that can occur (see Market Street, Cafe Corner, Green Grocer, Fire Brigade even). However, if you say such a generic 'I find people will pay more for used lego than new...' statement you are going to get quizzical looks from this bunch.
A better description is needed when making such a statement IMO.
As for reselling. I am in a grey zone. I build for fun as a hobby with my offspring. I do let hmrc now i sell as that is only fair. I sell at carboot sales and gumtree. On ebay i use a private account but i have played with the lego.
If your not correctly registered ebay uk will force you to one day, often prompted by ebayers reporting you, or a buyer may have a bad experience and report you direct to HMRC who can backdate owed tax.
I know several people who have learnt this the hard way so be careful.
And once registered there's that many costs you can offset against tax that you have to be turning over half serious money to show a profit.
I dont sell much lego on ebay as i am moving away from ebay. To much hassle these days.
But stating on a forum, that you've linked to an ebay account currently selling approx £800 of Lego, that you've bought over 30 joblots for at least £50 each and resold them and never made a loss, certainly paints a picture of knowingly purchasing for resale. Hence HMRC would want their cut on the profit. If telling them that its been played with and used gets you out of it I might try telling them I've displayed (i.e. used) my sealed sets before reselling so I'm in a grey area as well :)
I imagine that selling old stuff off is tax exempt as you normally make a loss for clothes, books, CDs, etc if you bought them new.
Hence a grey area if you buy a job lot, play with it and then sell it. Was the intention to sell there? If you turn over a lot of used Lego, tax man would say yes.
I do however think others are confusing things too. To list is not the same as selling.... I only pay tax on what i sell not on what i list.... But i would gladely take £800....
Of course there are collectible exceptions, but I'm of the mindset that a used, retired set is more likely NOT to break MSRP. In other words, if you open a set, there's a good chance you won't get MSRP for it no matter how long you hold onto it.
Norlego then stated "So he wont loose anything that was my point." I contend that if we're talking straight $ here (and no some esoteric play value), he may very well lose something. The OP broke open his TLR train. I think there's a really good chance he won't ever be able to get $100 for it again, ever.
Its not like lego is a collection of 2x2s and 2x4s in red, yellow, white, and blue anymore, the sheer variety of bricks makes the above scenario very legitimate, even with the original intention to sell.
I have a child, who wants a toy. I decide to buy Lego because I know that when my child no longer wants to play with his toy, I will be able to sell it and so won't lose money. When I do buy the Lego, I therefore have intention to sell it later. Doesn't seem that I am acting as a business.
However, if you buy a toy to sell again in a few weeks, but allow you child to help check it is complete and play with it for a very short period of time, then this will probably be viewed as trading.
There is a grey area about how long is enough time? Collectors come across this problem all the time - when they buy something for their collection, then sell it later as they have got a better one in the meantime.
Most people at carboots sales buy to sell. But it is difficult to claim this object was bought for resale and this one was not.
I keep my lego for longer than 2-3 weeks. Some i have for years.
These days children build a set 1-3 times and then ignore it. So to sell it after a few months is sensible.
If you are adding value by sorting sets out or putting them together, that is taxable.
Which is why, of course, it is best to be upfront about what you are doing and ask.
So you give a false account of your profits when you do a self assessment.
You do realise you can earn £10k until you start paying tax?
Having said all that, I really hope that my #10188 Death Star does not increase in value that much because I would love to be able to see my nephew build it in about 3-4 years time (after I have persuaded my brother-in-law to buy it off me). Maybe I need to buy another one now, just to cover all bases?
Anyway have fun with your set and keep it in good nick. You might get back what you paid for it in 3 years time. It is a fact that people will pay more than sets cost new if it is a popular set. I sell used lego for more than new cost. Of course you have no idea what will rise in value and what will not.
You can play it safe and buy cheap joblots. Cant go much wrong there...
I am not sure if I understand what that means.
Thanks.
He has also established that he is trading and submitting a UK tax return, so to comply with UK law he needs a eBay Business account which, as @cheshirecat stated, means DSR and also accepting returns.
Benefits include Top Rated / Premium service badge, FVF discount and as I can certainly vouch for, increased sales.
If also selling personal items then a separate private account is best.
http://pages.ebay.co.uk/businesscentre/identification/
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LEGO-City-7744-7945-7993-7641-7633-7210-7237-7738-4210-extras-Bundle-/221469464620?pt=UK_Construction_Toys_Kits&hash=item33909bd82c
It is very expensive, but if you got it for around £150 then you should be able to sell it on for double.
*roxio I have not sold much on Ebay, so not really "trading" as that implies you are selling things... And to have a business account and only sell 0-5 items a month is not worth while. (I sell via other outlets.) So maybe better to stop business selling on Ebay and comply with the law of the land. (Just wish everybody would keep to the speedlimits when driving, or is that to much to ask....) To pay £20 a month to sell 5 items is just not worth it.
*TheLoneTensor Hope this is clear: I sell used lego for more than the retail price. Some retired sets do sell for more than they cost new. But difficult to know upfront... The OP has bought one set he plans to sell on, nobody can say for sure he will lose money when he sells it in 3 years time. All I have said is he might get back his money if he keeps the lego in good nick. And if he does not, it is not the end of the world as he has played with the lego.
My contention is still this, I think most used sets will never sell more than they cost new, ever. I believe that even if you merely break the seal on anything, you won't be able to sell it for more than "new cost"/RRP/MSRP except for a few collectible sets. Start building and playing with it? Then you can pretty much kiss the chance of recouping your cost goodbye.
Now I love the TLR train as much as the next guy, probably even more, but giving the impression to the OP that down the road there's a chance he'll get more than $100 for a used/played with version of it is just really false hope.
The monthly subscription. You need that to list.
At the same time, I don't think it's as big a long shot as you are claiming with statements like "kiss the chance... goodbye" and "really false hope". You say it simply won't happen outside of a "few collectible sets".
Even if we limit ourselves to just looking at train sets of the past decade, Norlego's claim of > MSRP for a used set after 3 years of retirement is true for the majority, and more than just a 'few'. I don't have the hard data on how soon some of these achieved higher than MSRP values, so I'll just state whether it's currently the case since you said "never".
9467 Ghost Train: false, but very early - 7 months into retirement
10219 Maersk Train: true
7597 Western Train Chase: false, but very close - 2.5 years into retirement
10194 Emerald Night: true
4841 Hogwarts: true
10183 Hobby Train: true
7897 Passenger Train: false
10173 Holiday Train: true
10133 BNSF: true