Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I can't make this publicly available because of 'grumbling over at BrickLink' as brickmatic says.
Thanks in advance, and thanks for all your hard work.
Maybe make it a 'opt in' scheme rather than entirely public, to keep the bricklink'ers happy.
That having been said, short of withholding their minifig data, you do need to ask what exactly they can do about it, and indeed whether there'd be the collective will to act anyway. As alluded to by folks on here, there's a real question about who actually owns some of the images and inventories on Bricklink, so there might well be little or no legal grounds for complaint. Also, on the basis of messages on the Bricklink forums, the majority appear in favour of allowing Brickset use of the set inventories anyway. Which would of course make perfect sense, both for their business and the community as a whole.
I think the issue is probably around the use of the images, both from a (c) POV and also bandwidth. As someone else posted here, Troy at BL considers the inventories themselves to be owned by the community, as that was what Dan wanted.
Do we have any LDRAW experts here who could script something up to generate new parts images for Brickset & to share with the rest of the community under a creative commons or similar license (I'm not sure how the LDRAW parts are licensed, but that would have to be taken into account).
The real issue (IMHO) is this: (I'm stepping out of character and speaking as a naysayer for a moment)
"BrickLink admins and community members work hard creating and maintaining that data. Why should BrickLink-- a for-profit website-- simply give away its information to other community websites? BrickLink does all the work and other sites simply leech off the rewards?"
That's their gut reaction from what I can tell-- but it comes across being rather selfish, so they looked for other excuses, like bandwidth and image copyright, as if they were major issues.
You want a workaround for bandwidth? Caching. You want a workaround for images? I've got three: LEGO, Peeron, and LDraw. And that's me as a developer having actually approached and solved both problems, I can talk about details if you want, but that's not terribly relevant.
A real issue/excuse might be exclusivity, but I didn't see that mentioned in their arguments. Essentially, if BrickLink shares its data with BrickSet, that reduces the amount of visitors to BrickLink, who have come to depend on it for reliable inventory data. It gives people another place to go for inventory data OTHER than BrickLink.
Anyway, I don't mean to suggest that their gut reaction isn't warranted-- it's totally valid, and they're well within their rights. But suggesting that there's an issue with "bandwidth" is silly (unless they've done some detailed analysis and they haven't), and there are workarounds to image copyright that alleviate the problem enormously or eliminate it. I'd prefer it if they went straight to the issue at hand rather than bandy around excuses.
DaveE
If I was a BL seller I'd be CLAMOURING for Brickset to use the inventories and images and link through to BL. Why ? Consider this - Brickset has tens of millions of hits a year - it's a major player in the global LEGO online scene. And every time someone looks at an inventory on Brickset and clicks on a particular piece within that inventory, the browser is redirected to BL and the list of sellers who have that piece for sale. Can anyone think of a better way to drive business to these traders than that ? It's even cost-free FFS !
The frustrating thing from my perspective is that Brickset's request to use the inventories and link though to BL is such an obvious win-win for everybody concerned, and yet a minority of people with frankly illogical objections appears to have scuppered the whole thing, at least for now.
We had an argument about the relative sizes of BrickLink's and Brickset's audiences and rankings at Google and whether people coming here were aware of BrickLink already or not, but would be if more links were provided. Clearly things that are hard to determine.
If you enter 'Buy lego' Bricklink is at or near the top. For most other generic terms 'lego sets', 'lego database', 'lego guide', 'lego reviews' etc. Brickset is. In fact thanks to BrickLink's blanket 'no-follow' I'd wager that it doesn't rank in any other long-tailed search at all so unless you do really want to 'buy lego' you won't just stumble upon it.
Unfortunately nobody at BL is in a position to set something like that up, given no-one is in overall command.
Even if not, it still might be alright to do. However, a lawyer would need to evaluate that.
In any case, hot linking Brick Link is less of an issue than scripting image capture in LDraw from a copyright point of view. From a copyright point of view, hot linking Brick Link is less of an issue than caching its images.
I suspect what's needed is some eloquent Brickset advocates to ask the question again in their forum and see what comes of it this time. Last time my timing was particularly bad as Dan had just passed away although I didn't know it.
:-)
I honestly don't see that as a goal for BrickLink, but I can't say what BL stakeholders value.
DaveE
But anyway, from a practical point of view, surely there must be a partnership-type arrangement where a group of people own it jointly. I really don't think forums are the way to broker this kind of deal, I'd suggest finding out who they are and meeting with them. I'd also suggest not having this discussion (i.e. the one on this page) in public :-).
BUY LOTS OF IT!
I agree that this should be a win-win for everyone involved. Do they actually have someone in charge to drive and implement such a change on their side?
And I assume that's something Huw wouldn't consider doing (removing eBay/Amazon links), unless of course BrickLink suddenly manages to get a comparable affiliate program.
DaveE
Cheers!
All I could do was facepalm while reading some of those threads. I recall one thread where Huw was asking to link to BL and a BL seller was in a huff because there were not links to BL already, but there were links to Amazon and eBay. He basically said "Why should we let you link to us since you aren't linking to us now?" It made no sense whatsoever.
I have experienced in many situations when the leaders of the community/organization are silent, the stupid, ignorant minority makes stupid ignorant decisions for the community. That seems to be happening at BL. The inmates are running the asylum it seems.
Thankfully the leaders of this (Brickset) community are not silent and that encourages the intelligent, informed members of the community to be more vocal, and positive progress is maintained.
I'm under the same name. Thanks!
It. Is. Awesome.
Thanks, huw!
You will have found the 'view inventory full-screen' links I suspect which results in a page URL like this:
http://www.brickset.com/detail/inventory/?set=6876-1
Now, say I had disassembled all the Blacktron 1 sets and I wanted to reconstruct them but the parts were scattered to all four corners of my storage system, I'd want an easy way to gather all the parts I needed from one list, right?
Try this: http://www.brickset.com/detail/inventory/?set=6876-1,6894-1,6941-1,6954-1,6987-1
Just add set numbers to the end of the URL, separated by commas. The page introduction needs tweaking a bit but you get the idea...
^^ Enbric and Matthew, you're good to go...
Thanks so much, Huw. What do you know, Bricklink is going to be getting a lot more of my money now because of this feature.
i too would like the part functionality added to my account. name should be ThisIsMyCup.