Shopping at LEGO or Amazon?
Please use our links: LEGO.comAmazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

What are you building right now?

19091939596225

Comments

  • LEGO_Dad77LEGO_Dad77 Member Posts: 243
    @monkeyhanger and @chrisalddin, you are correct! :D Thanks for playing, your prize: a pic of Father & Son Ecto 1's! :) In the dark, cuz the power's out during this crazy storm.


    stluxchrisalddinkiki180703tallblocktooClutchPower
  • JooTogJooTog Member Posts: 945
    blogzilly said:
    pharmjod said:
    blogzilly said:
    @KingAlanI indeed, I am looking to find a decent deal on the MegaBLOKS NCC-1701. Not as good as LEGO might do it, but the Enterprise is often like sex and pizza.

    You missed your window on that one. Amazon had it 60% off over the christmas holidays. Don't know if it will get that low again. I passed even at 60% off, because mega bloks.
    SHIT. I suck.

    It's 40% off right now at Amazon. Saw it today at my local Best Buy at full price. I was curious and went to the MB site and it shows as retired (all Star Trek sets show as such).

    I have never own or even touch a MB set before... while the set looks good in pictures, I'm not planning to start now. Did download the instructions for "inspiration". (a MOC like that is way out of my league though).
  • TheFewTheFew Member Posts: 1,781
    A copy of the Lego Tracked Racer, using spares from my technic pile. Not entirely complete and slightly modified. But enough for some fun and save me buying it.


    stluxbandit778MooreFXkiki180703tallblocktooClutchPowerTheBigLegoski
  • kiki180703kiki180703 Member Posts: 1,063
    Received my green parts for the Lego Moulding Machines from Bricklink that I bought from a single seller, as @Legoboy advised me to do.


    MooreFXSumoLegoGothamConstructionCoTheBigLegoskisnowhitie
  • GremerGremer Member Posts: 183
    @blogzilly, the NCC-1701 is ~$100 off on Amazon.
    pharmjod
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    edited January 2017
    Gremer said:
    @blogzilly, the NCC-1701 is ~$100 off on Amazon.
    it also imports to the the uk.

    List Price:

    $249.99
    Price: $151.23 + $84.77 Shipping & Import Fees Deposit to United Kingdom Details
    You Save: $98.76 (40%)

    but the import fees are a killer.
  • pharmjodpharmjod Member Posts: 2,916
    Keep watching the enterprise. I won't be surprised if it goes lower. It hit $100 during the holidays.
  • blogzillyblogzilly Member Posts: 598
    pharmjod said:
    Keep watching the enterprise. I won't be surprised if it goes lower. It hit $100 during the holidays.
    I will. I want to buy it for 100. I don't care if the box is effed. ;)
    pharmjod
  • MaffyDMaffyD Member Posts: 3,577
    Gremer said:
    @blogzilly, the NCC-1701 is ~$100 off on Amazon.
    it also imports to the the uk.

    List Price:

    $249.99
    Price: $151.23 + $84.77 Shipping & Import Fees Deposit to United Kingdom Details
    You Save: $98.76 (40%)

    but the import fees are a killer.

    Thanks chris. I am unfortunately well aware of the importing costs. :(
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    started work on my #75059 it's a ok size, for it price i have imaged it as being a little bigger.
    anyhow i am done with bag 9 and when i go back to it next is bag 10. :p
    still it a fab build and part from the track at the bottom i am quite enjoying the build.
    (304 odd track part's) linking all them up was anything but Fun.
    building the 1st wheal frame was fun, the 2nd less so, the 3rd the fun was dying. the 4th the fun had left, so the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th. was hell. still i understand that part like that are needed, even if building them can get repetitive.
    MegtheCatkiki180703TheBigLegoski
  • blogzillyblogzilly Member Posts: 598
    I had some shots of a few other things I managed to get together. Hopefully I can find them here. Digging...digging...small stuff and an awesome larger piece.

    Gotta say, the Galaxy Squad Hive Crawler is one of the most interesting things I've built in the past year of getting back into LEGO. Highly recommended.









    catwranglerMooreFXLEGO_Dad77MegtheCattallblocktookiki180703ClutchPowerTheBigLegoskisnowhitie
  • FauchFauch Member Posts: 2,711
    I havent built a lego technic in a long time, but the legs mechanism in the hive crawler may be the best I've seen.

    this new arkham asylum may look better than I thought. I guess replacing the white roof parts would help the original quite a bit.
    pharmjod
  • dspigeldspigel Member Posts: 478
    Built this little fellow. 
    MooreFXLEGO_Dad77kiki180703ClutchPower
  • SprinkleOtterSprinkleOtter Member Posts: 2,779
    SumoLego said:
    Finished up the Falcon.  I am impressed with the building techniques, but the nose of the ship is noticably short, and the gun turret is missing on the bottom.

    There is a common theme of undergunned Snowtroopers assaulting Rebels.  One gun versus the Falcon seems a bit of a fool's errand.



    And I'm short a 'Hyperdrive' sticker for the second copy...

    Now, it's on to piecing together an AT-AT and an X-Wing!
    The missing bottom turret bothered me as well. Overall a nice Falcon, though.
    SumoLegokiki180703
  • KingAlanIKingAlanI Member Posts: 2,354
    Recce said:
    Received my green parts for the Lego Moulding Machines from Bricklink that I bought from a single seller, as @Legoboy advised me to do.

    I built mine last year in Lime green colour with all the parts taken from my parts stash as I didn't BL.
    I often tweak a build based on what pieces I already have, so I know the feeling.

    -

    I finally got into Star Trek late last year, and now I want those MegaBlocks too. Maybe I'll buy one of the smaller sets to get a feel. The only others are Bridge, (mirror universe) Transporter Room, Guardian of Forever, Day of the Dove and Klingon D7. D7's are comparable to the Enterprise (Constitution-class) but this one is at much smaller scale (351 vs 3098 pc) - maybe I'll play with it like a Bird-of-Prey.
    Besides figures, there are enough special pieces/prints that I won't try to build them out of LEGO

    -

    I got a S16 Rogue as a gift and got out, arranged and photographed my current army, along with S15 Frightening Knight. I changed some parts for variety and to sell CMF pieces. It makes sense to deploy the melee troops in front of the ranged weapons. Blue looks odd, but it's the only large enough baseplate I had handy. I'm using some green 32x32's for mosaics and a checkers board, which I could put on blue to free up green but moving all those pieces would be a pain in the neck...err, thumbs.

    http://www.mediafire.com/view/0hycl69g1drjajj/0820 Wolf Infantry.jpg
    http://www.mediafire.com/view/6fb47bxxas6wds2/0819 Bear Infantry.jpg


    LEGO_Dad77TheBigLegoski
  • bellybutton290bellybutton290 Member Posts: 453

    Currently working on a scarif layout.  Finished product will be four 48x48 base plates with beach, more cargo areas and landing pad for Krennic's shuttle.
    sid3windrstarwars4everMegtheCatDoctorMcGannstluxAllBrickkiki180703ClutchPower
  • pharmjodpharmjod Member Posts: 2,916
    The hive crawler is probably one of the most enjoyable builds I've ever done. It is ingenious in design and a total aha moment comes when you do the final assembly of the legs. Also, it is incredibly creepy with the clicking of the legs. Just a perfect set.
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    started work on my #75059 it's a ok size, for it price i have imaged it as being a little bigger.
    anyhow i am done with bag 9 and when i go back to it next is bag 10. :p
    still it a fab build and part from the track at the bottom i am quite enjoying the build.
    (304 odd track part's) linking all them up was anything but Fun.
    building the 1st wheal frame was fun, the 2nd less so, the 3rd the fun was dying. the 4th the fun had left, so the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th. was hell. still i understand that part like that are needed, even if building them can get repetitive.
    finished it.
    look's awesome.
    now. ware the hell do i put it?
    TheBigLegoski
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    MaffyD said:
    My latest. I'm on a bit of an architecture trip at the moment:

    It is a lovely scale model, if a little frustrating to build. I reckon that bus is stuck in that position now.
    being a Brit i do plan on getting that set. just as soon as i can find it for a good price.
    and have the cash at the same time.
  • MaffyDMaffyD Member Posts: 3,577
    ^ I got it because I've been in it. It's quite a sumptuous palace, if smaller on the inside than you imagine it would be...
    TheOriginalSimonBkiki180703
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    MaffyD said:
    ^ I got it because I've been in it. It's quite a sumptuous palace, if smaller on the inside than you imagine it would be...
    if you know there is a inner courtyard quite a big one at that then the size dont surprise you, never been inside my self. but i know other member's of my extended family have.

    i did go to Hampton Court Palace with my school many many years ago. that was a nice day trip.
    KingAlanIMaffyD
  • MaffyDMaffyD Member Posts: 3,577
    ^ Not wanting to go too far off-topic but Hampton Court is arguably a better destination than Buckingham, based on what's there and how free you are to wander around. You are rather constrained at Buckingham, although my son and I got to use the palace bathroom there as he had a problem with his gastrostomy and it couldn't wait until we got to the end of the tour where the visitor loos were.
    LEGO_Dad77kiki180703KingAlanI
  • MaffyDMaffyD Member Posts: 3,577
    Next up for me (probably over the weekend, maybe Friday night, possibly next week if it all goes pear-shaped) will be either the Caterham or Chicago... decisions, decisions... :-)
  • blogzillyblogzilly Member Posts: 598
    pharmjod said:
    The hive crawler is probably one of the most enjoyable builds I've ever done. It is ingenious in design and a total aha moment comes when you do the final assembly of the legs. Also, it is incredibly creepy with the clicking of the legs. Just a perfect set.
    Completely agree.
  • blogzillyblogzilly Member Posts: 598
    @MaffyD Go for the Caterham. I'd love to see that built. Nice BP. I'm loving the Architecture line myself. Tried to get more from the LEGO Store, they were sold out of a bunch. The manager told me the theme was super popular right now.


    MaffyDtallblocktookiki180703Glacierfalls265ClutchPowersnowhitie
  • Addicted2OxygenAddicted2Oxygen Member Posts: 470
    Finally got around to building the space slug from bricklinked parts. A nice first build of the year. 

    MaffyDstluxkiki180703Glacierfalls265ClutchPowersnowhitie
  • VorpalRyuVorpalRyu Member Posts: 2,318
    @blogzilly, Myer has it for 20% off RRP at the moment, so tempted to pull the trigger myself, especially with the rumours of an upcoming UCS MF.
  • jumalichijumalichi Member Posts: 62
    I started yesterday evening the Technic crane truck 8258 from 2009. It was still sealed on the shelf in my LEGO room. That's a really good set very pleasant to build. All the functions and the parts inventory seem excellent.
    After finishing the Porsche 42056, i carry on with the same designer Uwe Wabra...
  • josekaleljosekalel Member Posts: 683
    Not nearly as exciting as many of you, but got to build #30354 Hot Rod...not my favorite but can't complain for the price.


    LEGO_Dad77AanchirMooreFXtallblocktooClutchPowerTheBigLegoskisnowhitie
  • catwranglercatwrangler Member Posts: 1,895
    I'm halfway through the Fortrex. I like how, although it's a symmetrical build, it doesn't feel repetitive, and the tank treads were really fun to put together. I was a bit surprised, though, that it didn't really feel stable until halfway through the third bag - it was as if the archway piece over the drawbridge was a millimetre too big and parts of the towers on either side kept trying to ease apart; whenever I fixed it on one side it would start to go on the other, like something was in tension somewhere. Of course that wasn't the case; the second half of that bag seemed to solve the issue incrementally and it's fine now, but I wondered if anyone else noticed the same thing?
    chrisalddin
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    I'm halfway through the Fortrex. I like how, although it's a symmetrical build, it doesn't feel repetitive, and the tank treads were really fun to put together. I was a bit surprised, though, that it didn't really feel stable until halfway through the third bag - it was as if the archway piece over the drawbridge was a millimetre too big and parts of the towers on either side kept trying to ease apart; whenever I fixed it on one side it would start to go on the other, like something was in tension somewhere. Of course that wasn't the case; the second half of that bag seemed to solve the issue incrementally and it's fine now, but I wondered if anyone else noticed the same thing?
    not that i recall then again i did build it about 1 year ago.
    i do recall it being a fun build :) NEXO KNIGHTS for the win!
    Go Nexo POWER!!!!
    catwrangler
  • blogzillyblogzilly Member Posts: 598
    I actually notice that on a lot of LEGO builds. I sit there thinking "How the heck will this stay together!" and then bam it does. I also think sometimes that designers purposely reverse or turn things in instructions so you can't quite see the big picture until you get to certain points, kind of like a reveal.
    chrisalddincatwranglerjosekalelMegtheCatTheBigLegoski
  • chrisalddinchrisalddin Member Posts: 3,041
    blogzilly said:
    I actually notice that on a lot of LEGO builds. I sit there thinking "How the heck will this stay together!" and then bam it does. I also think sometimes that designers purposely reverse or turn things in instructions so you can't quite see the big picture until you get to certain points, kind of like a reveal.
    part of my Sandcrawler was like that.
    and it was the part you go to grab it by, when you pick it up to move it.
    by the time the build was finished you can pick it up by that part now, but mid build, it's a bad idea.
    catwrangler
  • bandit778bandit778 Member Posts: 2,398
    Despite having a reasonable backlog of sets to build, today this one jumped to the top of the pile.

    This is one of the few ships from the original trilogy era that I haven't had the pleasure of building before and I loved it.
    Even the stickers that are wrapped around the white half cylinders on the engines didn't halt my enjoyment of putting this together.
    My only complaint with this set was with the back pack that is built for the Moroff figure, it's way to heavy and to get him to be free standing you have to bend him over so he's constantly looking at the floor or lean him up against something, but all in all it's a minor gripe on a really well put together build.
    catwranglerdspigelstluxDeeC2_JoshSwitchfoot55blogzillyClutchPowerTheBigLegoskisnowhitie
  • Glacierfalls265Glacierfalls265 Member Posts: 273
    ^ That should say spent, not spend, lol.
  • catwranglercatwrangler Member Posts: 1,895
    blogzilly said:
    I actually notice that on a lot of LEGO builds. I sit there thinking "How the heck will this stay together!" and then bam it does. I also think sometimes that designers purposely reverse or turn things in instructions so you can't quite see the big picture until you get to certain points, kind of like a reveal.
    part of my Sandcrawler was like that.
    and it was the part you go to grab it by, when you pick it up to move it.
    by the time the build was finished you can pick it up by that part now, but mid build, it's a bad idea.
    Yeah, I've been picking it up by the very part that seemed the frailest/most reluctant to click in and it feels incredibly stable! It now has pride of place on the coffee table and we've been having a great time testing the various ballistics. :)
    bandit778LEGO_Dad77TheOriginalSimonB
  • KingAlanIKingAlanI Member Posts: 2,354
    MaffyD said:
    ^ I got [Buckingham] because I've been in it. It's quite a sumptuous palace, if smaller on the inside than you imagine it would be...
    So that's where the TARDIS gets its space from? :P

    blogzilly said:
    I actually notice that on a lot of LEGO builds. I sit there thinking "How the heck will this stay together!" and then bam it does. I also think sometimes that designers purposely reverse or turn things in instructions so you can't quite see the big picture until you get to certain points, kind of like a reveal.
    #41180 was fragile a couple bags in, a problem with stopping a couple bags in.
    Maybe there are artistic reasons for drawn out instructions, I figure many little steps are handholding for the intended audience of kids

    -

    I got 5 more Rogue recently and developed my army besides just assembling those. I'd already changed some parts. I got out shields to go with swords or short spears. I was able to match colors, which looks really sharp. Nexo shield holders without the tiles don't look too futuristic. I'm low on medieval helmets but have plenty of female hair from buying several #30399. http://www.mediafire.com/view/0hycl69g1drjajj/



    TheBigLegoski
Sign In or Register to comment.

Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?

Please use our links: LEGO.com Amazon

Recent discussions Categories Privacy Policy Brickset.com

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.