Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
You seem to relish the potential demise of reselling, as a result of this reissue. For me resellers are a great asset. If you have the means (and the will to spend that much), you can get hold of long discontinued sets. If resellers didn't exist, you wouldn't be able to buy a UCS MF for £1000, you wouldn't be able to buy one at all. I don't see any poor morals in the act of reselling, just sour grapes that sets you may like to acquire could be out of your financial reach or beyond your will to spend that much. Should resellers not exist at all so you can't get hold of an old set, or should they hoard sets to pass off at RRP forever more like some guardian angel of Lego collecting?
There are a few times when the redo is inferior to the original. It would seem that even if TLG got it right first time, they are obliged to make changes to a redo so that it seems something new. Looking at the front end of the new Khettana, and the nose of this new UCS X-wing I would say that these have suffered as a result of TLG trying to be different to the original, but not finding a way to improve upon it.
I am not as excited about the Ewok Village. Probably because I detest Ewoks even when I first watched RotJ during my youngling days I would rather they make the Padawan Menace II and continue the adventure of "Ian". To be honest, the spinoffs should be rather light hearted affairs and not concern too much about the war aspect of "Star Wars".
;)
If you read the old Han novels from long ago, he actually used to be an Imperial Officer, but when he saw how Chewie was treated, he freed him and fled with him, that is where the life-debt came from.
I don't recall if that has been ret-conned or not in latter books, but the very first books before the Zahn books, that was the story.
Those resellers are not going to stop you or any other reseller buying stock. If they want to list at high prices, let them. If resellers with a conscience have stock, then they will be listing at lower prices, meaning that there is still a secondary market which is priced fairly (whatever that means). It is only if all resellers decide not to have a conscience that there is a problem. If the last reseller that has a conscience and all others have sold, then would he put his prices up towards the bad ones? Probably.
I just don't see that resellers without a conscience can be bad for a hobby. If they want high prices, higher than anyone is willing to pay, then they will not sell anything. The buyers will all be buying from resellers with a conscience.
These discussions remind me a little of something a good friend of mine in the financial services industry always says. 'there is no such thing as a completely ethical investment'. If you want to be very conscious and ethical, make as much money as you can then give some profits to charity.
I wonder what the worst option is for people that already have it. Either a remake, with revised and up to date parts, or a complete reissue.
I get the impression that it is a play set, not a display set. I think we're due for a large display set in October... Hmm, UCS Sandcrawler!!! :)
The Millennium Falcon's iconic position in the Star Wars universe didn't change between 2007 and now, so I don't think that alone can justify why a redesign or reissue would be a better seller this time around.
What's different now, as you say, is that people have seen it reach $2000 on the aftermarket and they've adjusted their value of such a set. Surely a segment of the market will keep this in mind and definitely jump on a re-release, but it won't be everyone.
The re-release will not have an instant $2000 value. The promise of that future valuation isn't certain. 10179 aftermarket prices will sag due to the new alternative and some will say that it never should have been valued that high. In the end, for many it will be yet another high cost set that for one reason or another they're never quite able to pull the trigger on.
I do agree that a comparable re-release will do better than the original 10179. But even though 10179 is the most wanted and has the highest want:own ration by far on Brickset, it's very unlikely to sniff a top 10 rank in annual highest grossing sets.
I'm going to be thinking (and I suspect many others who similarly missed out), ¨Thank you, LEGO, for giving me another chance to afford this, so that I don't have to spend thousands of dollars on 10179.¨
No, the USC line will never be the top selling line in volume. It can't be. It's a boutique niche. But for its core customer, us rabid AFOLS, it will be the most coveted.
The reason I stated that it won't be worth $2000 immediately wasn't to suggest that it would be the primary reason to buy it. Rather, I was countering your assertion that $500 would be "peanuts, a right bargain" such that it would be an automatic buy.
I think for some it will be, but most will wait for double VIP points or hold out for discounts from other retailers which won't come until well into its product life. Then it will catch people off guard and retire and we'll be right back where we started :P
I do agree people will wait for a sale or double points or another promotion. Five hundred dollars or whatever price LEGO is going to peg this imaginery rehash is still going to be a lot of money. It is for many families, mine including. But my automatic buy doesn't mean buying it on release day; it means definitely buying it when you can rustle up the cash, when there is a sale and not totally dismissing as a 'crazy price, who would pay that?' 10188 has taught me well.
And yes, the cycle will continue. We can't always get what we want. Life is more fun that way.
Anyway, it took a LONG time to sell out of those first editions. They were available forever, especially when you consider the preorder was 8 months before shipping. So they sold say, roughly 10,000 that whole first year, if that. And that was to the hardcore collectors, the guaranteed buyers. Who was left after that? A few new to the game AFOLs or late to the party SW collectors? No way they sold that many per year in the years after.
The point is, I don't think they made very many of these in the first place, I don't think it sold well (although it may have met TLG expectations -- remember they took preorders 8 months before release, so they knew how many to produce, at least at first) and if they remade it, it would likely sell even worse, as many of the people who already bought one wouldn't buy another (and I don't think the number of new buyers would displace the old buyers). The one wildcard would be resellers, who would presumably buy a ton more stock this time around.
Then again, I have read here and there a rumoured price of ca. 200 USD, which clearly would make it much smaller than 10188.
So i'm picturing four wooden huts connected by bridges with the tree bits missed off. Can't really see what else itcould possibly be, and it doesn't sound like the sort of thing you'd want to display next to a cool Xwing.
Now if it was the imperial base, I can see that looking a little cooler. Stick an ATAT on there, the big dish.
R
Pretty much all the main minifigures were there as well, so you can have a great supply of them, plus throw in a couple ugnauts and Lobot
I understand now when you more correctly describe it as "definite". Automatic is reflexive, involuntary, and without deliberation. So the set is released, and it is bought automatically without hesitation and consideration. Waiting for sales, allocating money, etc. are conditions that may never come to pass.