Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
Thinking about it now, another collaboration with Lego I'd love to see is Tim Schafer/Double Fine. Imagine Lego Monkey Island, Psychonauts, Costume Quest :)
Likewise, where is m Half-Life 3??? :)
Every month could be too much, perhaps every other month, 6 releases a deal. Have them separate from the normal twice a year release schedule Lego does, put them in the Lego retail stores, [email protected], and Amazon, and go with it, that would be enough to get attention and draw interest in Cuusoo.
^^ Thank you also for the feedback. While it is pretty simple, I was hoping for the appeal to all the Anne of Green Gables fanatics out there (there are many). Such a set would not appeal to an AFOL. Which is a problem too...even if a lot of Green Gables fans (typically women) saw it on facebook and their forums and voted for it, would they actually buy it? They would not typically be the crowd visiting LEGO brand stores and lego.com. It would have to be marketed on Prince Edward Island where all the tourists go, which is not something LEGO has done with Cuusoo products.
Every tourist attraction in the world could have something like this, sold only at the attraction. The lack of wide appeal outside of being sold as tourist souvenirs at the site means that sales would be low.
When Shawn of the Dead was killed, that was the beginning of the end... Firefly didn't help either...
The thing is, if LotR can be made, those two should be able to be made. That strict policy kills most interest because the average adult doesn't want to play, "guess Lego's policy"
Seriouslly, hire people for that job who can do it, speaking in front of a camera isn't as easy as you'd think, I know I suck at it (and I've tried).
When CEOs get up to do keynote speechs, they get lots of training from speaking coaches to do it right, it is a learned skill.
Not bashing the person, perhaps he is great at his job, just saying that is very amaturish video work...
Looks pretty cool!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uobWt7FU5qk&feature=plcp
But since it is just the name that is trademarked, the project could still succeed under a new name - see http://legocuusoo.posterous.com/ for more info.
I personally think that the name is so generic that any name change would benefit the final product! What do you think it should be called?
I'd love to see it succeed under a different name, it intrigues me a lot more than the slightly lacklustre galaxy squad.
It could be re-named 'Galaxy Marines' and be a spin-off of Galaxy Squad.
But to just storm in there and tell LEGO to pull the project sounds like a real jerky reaction. The ones who loose out on this is basically GW, who had a chance to negotiate a license. Now the project will be just renamed something more generic and GW will never get part of the pie. Actually, I'm glad they are out of the picture at this early stage. Who needs such a partner?...)c:
"Hi LEGO Fans. You're probably wondering what happened to those awesome-looking space military guys on LEGO CUUSOO; you know, the ones that reached 10,000 supporters just before the Winter Review deadline. Well, the name of the project used by the fan builder is actually a trademark owned by another company, and they requested we stop using it on our site.
While we let you submit projects that refer to trademarks owned by others, we don't enforce others' trademarks ourselves. However we are legally obligated to comply when we receive a request from a rights holder to remove their trademarks.
Since all of you voted the project to 10,000, and since the artwork is original and based on LEGO elements, it's our opinion that the only trademark infringement here is the use of the name. So, we're in contact with NickRoyer to pick a new name and continue to consider the project in the Winter Review. We hope to have it back online soon with the new name.
Sorry about the surprise, and happy building!".
Pretty much answers all our questions.
SUPER space marines ;) JK
Maybe Alien Marines?
A large part of their business is selling very expensive miniatures to be used in their tabletop games. Why would they license something that could take the place of their own product?
... so they had no choice, really.
Source: Ain't It Cool News Hears from Bob Gale on the Hoverboard Replica
So, GW is acting very consistently with their principles by "asking" CUUSOO to remove the "Space Marine" name, as this is arguably part of their Space Hulk miniatures gaming system (and maybe Warhammer 40k too) IP. Any gamers in the crowd will not be surprised...
Since TLG is aggressive in protecting their own IP, I bet they didn't see this request as objectionable in any way. I'm sure TLG would have done the same thing if GW had produced a tabletop game called "Friends" that featured a group of young girls having fun riding horses and grooming animals.
LOL! *Smiley laughing its head of goes here...*
Who has dibs on the first one that actually works like in the movie? I'll even take one in Pink, so long as it has power. :)
You may be right that LEGO would have asked GW to desist if they'd "produced a tabletop game called "Friends" that featured a group of young girls having fun riding horses and grooming animals" (!) but it's a totally different scenario - there's no actual LEGO product infringing a GW trademark for GW to complain about, just the use of the words "Space Marines" and some fan art, and hence my scorn. By the same token, every Cuusoo idea based upon existing I.P. should be removed from the site....
NickRoyer already had several other naming suggestions, as the coincidental likeness to Warhammer had been identified previously.
I don't think the project will suffer as a result of this - TBH, with Galaxy Squad being released, TLG have no reason to use this project whatsoever.
I hope they do though. I like it!
I wasn't actually aware of the GW property until this little storm in a teacup; if the original idea wasn't actually based on the GW property, however, it would nevertheless seem to be a good way of tapping into a passionate, existing community, and also potentially also a nice little for GW, so who knows....
The registration of the trademark requires an actual product but violation of the trademark does not.