I'm interested to hear anyone's experience investing in desirable parts using Pick A Brick and Bricks & Pieces.
Minifigures and animals are the main reason I buy certain sets. I finally realized that I could try to buy these items directly from Lego.com PaB and BnP at a fraction of the price of the entire set. Prices for the parts on Bricklink are a notable percentage above Lego.com. Bricklink prices for minifigures and animals from years ago seem to be quite high.
This suggests an investment opportunity: buying desirable parts from Lego.com, holding them for a few years, then selling them. Parts are smaller and more dense than entire sets, so investing in them is more efficient for storing and for shipping when selling.
The inspiration for this came from buying the baby elephant from
#60302. Instead of spending $90 on the set, I decided to try Bricks & Pieces for the first time. The baby elephant was there for $7.80 so I gladly bought two. The effort for someone at Lego to pick two elephants would be essentially the same as them picking ten, so why not scale it up.
The price disparity became clear when I wanted the tiger suit skater from
#80109. There are very few for sale on Bricklink at $20, though all of its parts are available at BnP for $7.14. Since I'm going to buy one for myself and it would be minimal extra work for Lego to pick more for me, why not buy a few extra.
I'm conflicted about this because I don't like paying high prices to scalpers and resellers for sets I missed out on, so I don't want to be "that guy". But I look at how few animals are available on Bricklink from older themes (2018 City Arctic, 2017 City Jungle) and wonder if I could fill a demand for these parts after a few years. In four years, perhaps I'll wish I had six baby elephants and not want to pay the higher price to get them, wishing I had bought more at $7.80. Yes, FOMO is plaguing me again. But
$60 for the tiger* from
#60162 only fuels that FOMO.
* The tiger might not support the investment idea.
#60162 was a Toys'R'Us exclusive, likely increasing its scarcity. Perhaps the tiger was never on BnP because of the exclusive. The set cost $150 at the time, which may have deterred other buyers (as it did me), increasing scarcity even further.
Comments