Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
In a similar vein, I didn't think Assault on Hoth was that bad and I think the door build looks fantastic actually. I think had it not been for the UCS badge on the box, it would have had a pretty warm reception. I think it's pretty ridiculous how worked up some people get over a tiny, insignificant badge on a box.
I'm glad this thread has had such a great response and I'm not the only one with such controversial opinions!
I've touched on this before but YouTubers like just2good and MandrProductions do not deserve their platform, especially the latter one. The entitlement and bratty behaviour from Ryan consistently puts me off his videos. I actually do enjoy some of his content but he always lets himself down by inserting a comment that makes him seem so spoilt. Just2good is less problematic, but what bothers me is that in his reviews he only ever seems to be concerned with the exclusivity of figures over anything else.
I'm sure they're nice guys in person but the way they come across in their videos is so unlikeable.
*runs away with a kerpew and a puff of cartoon dust*
I also found the Benny and Unikitty characters to be annoying.
!
There is a difference between austentatiously bathing in oil, tacitly acknowledging oil, and actively trying to distance oneself from oil. I'm not sure what the best approach is. Probably not the former or the latter.
I like this topic!
(My normal criticisms still apply.)
Now that is something I haven't seen before done, and I'll admit, it looks pretty good and a valid (in my opinion) solution to the dilemma I addressed.
I think he's since deleted that video, rightfully so.
https://www.lego.com/en-gb/legal/notices-and-policies/fair-play/
LEGO = The LEGO Company
LEGO = one or more bricks made by the the LEGO company
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium
Lego town and city dioramas featuring the everyday lives of minifigs going about their business and all the sets that showcase that same thing are boring and I find them uninteresting to look at and dull to play with.
Modulars, Friends sets, a lot of Creator, Trains, Sports, City (if not going into space), and Town all come under this grouping.
I think it comes from years of being given such sets as presents while my older brother got Lego Space and basically forced me into changing my vehicles and fire stations into spaceships that weren't as good as his probably soured me on those themes.
Sorry. I still admire their creativity and building technique though!
/runs away
Also people names over here, specifically Craig being pronounced Creg but also Graham pronounced as Gram and Aaron as A-ron. Adolf as A-dolf too but that name doesn't come up quite as often as the others.
My main room is a weird mix of SW UCS, Roller Coaster, Old Fishing Store, Architecture sets and my fairly extensive SW minifig display.
Regarding “...its LEGO (LEG-O) not LAAAAAY-GO, not LAAAAYGOES not LEG-A. LEGO, LEG then OH. LEGO.” from Speedman, someone said this to one of the Danish hosts on the inside tour and they said ‘Lay-go’ is actually closer to how the Danish say it in their pronunciation - so depends on how authentic you want to go.
I’d find it odd if you couldn’t use the Lego plural the same way as ‘sheep’ though.
* I seek out play features in a set. Even though I'm past the point of being inclined to play with a set, display-only sets really need to look good to entice me, because it's not very fun to have something just to look at. I love mechanisms and transformations and whatnot built into models, though it needs to be extensive enough to grab me. I like to fiddle with my models and admire the engineering.
* Minifigures are not overrated and I am very susceptible to buying a set based on its minifigures. I'm extremely interested in storytelling and character design, so the characters in a set often take precedence over the model for me and I adore the Minifigures theme.
* Minifigure series without a mythological or spooky character are automatically less interesting to me. I like light fantasy, sci-fi and some everyday characters, but if there's no dark or mythic character provided in the series, no character to hook me, it's very hard to muster the interest for the other figures, even if they're very nice.
* Large chunky pieces that could be substituted with smaller bricks never bother me, and they often look smoother and more clean (and take less time) than an assembly.
* I like fleshie and yellow minifigures and don't wish for a change in either's domain.
* I really don't like troops or faceless evil minions and can't see the appeal in army-building. My favorite LEGO characters are unique, personable bad guys in rogues-gallery fashion, like the Agents and Ultra Agents villains. I'm not even a fan of themed teams like Ninjago's and usually prefer to collect the bad guy in charge and ignore the underlings. It' also part of why I've been unimpressed with Hidden Side. I get the logic of never making non-possession ghosts physical unless the set takes place in the ghost world, and the designs of the boss ghost characters are extravagant, large, and hard to imagine "in the brick", but the fact remains that the most interesting villains in that line will probably never be toys. The possessed characters did get more interesting, though, and the third wave has a different type of enemy, so I'm interested in the later sets, plus some of the first wavers that have good play value.
In Newbury, that's quite likely. (If that was what you were getting at.)
- Remakes in Star Wars do not bother me, as long as they demonstrate significant improvement over the previous set, although I think their scheduling could be improved. The aforementioned #75218 X-wing Starfighter is an excellent example.
Sorry to those who want the Star Wars theme to conclude but the press release for #75275 A-wing Starfighter included the following comment: "LEGO Star Wars is its [LEGO's] most successful theme". That seemed an unusual way to reveal such notable information so I checked with the LEGO Star Wars design team and it is accurate. Star Wars overtook City as the best-selling theme during 2018 and remained on top last year.I'm not sorry... :o)
To keep on topic though: I guess this proves that it really is an unpopular opinion to want the line to die!
On the space one as well, I thought Space was at its best with the sub themes of the 90s - M-Tron, Space Police II, Ice Planet, Spyrius, Exploriens, I even liked UFO and Insectoids (which is an unpopular opinion). They pushed the envelope a lot more than most of the space sets before and I was too young to have most of them when they came out.
* I don't mind open-backed building sets. As long as the facade is pretty enough, I have no problem with an open back for play. I even commend a good balance for a good price, like the upcoming Hidden Side castle, which looks more substantial and detailed than I'd expect from a $100 set, and that seems achieved by their decision to open the back. For enclosed buildings, I genuinely don't know if I prefer a dollhouse of floor-separation style, so open-back buildings don't make me think twice.
* Colored Technic pins or exposed bars really don't bother me too much. Exposed studs or antistuds where they don't go, however, do.