Hello, I was wondering what the best practices for anchoring a long n x 1 brick, used vertically for support, would be for maximum solidity. I need to support quite a large architectural structure above a fairly open space; the sides of the space cannot be load-bearing and so I will have pillars inside the space. For aesthetic and scale-related reasons I would like to have these pillars be no larger than 1 stud x 1 stud. I had thought of using a 1 x 16 technic brick vertically, as potentially stronger than a spindly tower of three 1 x 1 x 5 bricks, which doesn't seem like it would be particularly strong. My questions are:
1) Am I right that a single brick or beam will be better than a tower of three 1x1x5 bricks? The structure above will be approx. 30-35 bricks high, and 30 studs by 95 studs. Approximately a 30 stud by 30 stud area of this needs to be supported in this way, only using 1x1 pillars, of which I could place about 9. (The rest of the supported structure can have sturdier support as it will be hidden from view -- I would also appreciate any recommendations for this.)
2) If using a vertical beam, how to anchor it so it bears the weight properly? At first I was thinking a bracket attached to the baseplate and to two studs of the 1x16 brick. But this seems like it will be transferring the load-bearing to a sideways stud connection so this is probably no good. I could put two 2x1 bricks down either side of the vertical brick and attach the three with a technic pin, but then the vertical beam won't be touching the baseplate.
3) How about at the top? How to anchor the plates above these beams--the same way, with two bricks "straddling" the vertical brick using a pin, then build on top of these bricks?
4) If I use a long brick vertically like this, and if I use the technic holes and a pin, would there be any advantage to using a liftarm instead of a studded technic brick?
My thanks to those of you with experience with this kind of structure!
Comments
In either case, for mounting it I would recommend sticking with Technic for the greatest amount of stability. Using a frame of Technic bricks inside the floor and ceiling should ensure that the supports line up correctly and that the overall structure remains strong.
For the liftarm version, I am imagining this: https://imgur.com/a/QcCmYAz
I'd extend this kind of arrangement to other pillars in the same way. The plates for the upper storeys would then be attached to the horizontal bricks, and I'd build on that. What do you think? It seems odd to me that the vertically positioned brick is not bearing weight through its bottom, but via a peg. Also it's obvious to me now that the whole thing can tip "sideways" very easily so I'd have to anchor it at each end. I wouldn't want the technic assembly on the floor baseplate to take any more room than this (which is already more than I'd like--I was hoping to avoid a sunken floor).
The building I'm modelling has square pillars but a studded or technic brick is already different-looking enough that using the cylinder of Technic pins wouldn't be out of the question if that ends up being better in some way.
Or maybe I'm overthinking and I'd be fine with the tower of 1x1 bricks for each pillar.
The smallest bushing is one half-stud in length, I believe, and I don't think that's right either. Thanks