Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
£ $ €
For a rich kids playset.
In my opinion, the Millennium Falcon is a "rich kids" item, and one that exceeded what Lego sets should cost....this (and the first Death Star) are "kids saving up their allowances, holiday and chore money for a long while" playsets.
When it was released, Brothers Brick had an excellent review of the Falcon, one that concentrated as much on the subjective build experience as it did aspects that are typically reviewed. Their point, one that I agree with, is that the Falcon is akin to a Bugatti Veyron: lots of people have VWs, but the Veyron is a halo item - what can be done with unlimited budget, time, and resources, where the CEOs say "Give us your pinnacle design." The level of detail and verisimilitude in the Falcon is unbelievable, especially when you see it in person every shift at work and marvel at the overall product - the sheer size, scope, and aura of it is unlike every other Lego set - and that's exactly its point for existing.
I can't tell you how many customers' eyes watered when I told them the price, but as I said about many other big sets, for me, the value isn't necessarily price-per-piece, but more the question "Does it feel like a $_______ set?" In my opinion, the VW Camper feels like much more than a $120 set, and the Saturn V even moreso. The '66 Batcave was the opposite - didn't feel like I was building a $270 set when I assembled the one for the Gallery display. I think that this subjective experience can be applied to sets of any price - the Bounty Hunters Battle Pack is a great value for $15, for example. In reading the reviews and watching Jang's video, I'm not sure it feels like a $350 set. I'll wait to see it in the brick, but I don't think my mind will change any more so than it did when I saw the Aston Martin.
As someone who suffers from stingy-itus, I have a hard time spending money on most things. Often times, Lego purchases for me come down to my perceived feeling of the value. When I look at the Cloud City set, even though there are elements I think are interesting, I just don't feel like it would be worth my money. Others may and do feel differently. In contrast, others may feel another higher priced set isn't worth it whereas I can't get the money out of my wallet fast enough*. To each their own I guess.
*this has never actually happened due to said stingy-itus
A long time ago (back in 1985) I asked if I could have the G.I. Joe U.S.S. F.L.A.G.G. This toy, in my opinion, was every kids dream at the time. This thing was gigantic and to me, worth every bit of it's $109.99 retail price. In adjusted US Dollars, that's about $265 today. The Betrayal at Cloud City is not worth the $350 US price tag.
On reflection, even with the valid critiques, I'd happily buy the betrayal of Cloud City, if I have enough funds at somepoint. I'd definitely want to wait for double points, and there's Harry Potter to get first. I can see it being one I'll struggle to justify buying when there are overall much better sets out.
^ Is it just me, or does the Slave 1 look like its landed in a muddy puddle....?
I'm similarly underwhelmed by it, but I'll still buy it at some point.