Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
The way the company worked in the 1990s and before was essentially without contact from the community. They'd develop products (for kids) behind closed doors, do some product testing with them, and then release the stuff that did well in testing.
LEGO Direct was an attempt to engage the consumers directly, and respond to consumer demands-- in particular the AFOL community, which was centered around LUGNET and RTL. Eventually, LEGO Direct dissolved, but also morphed into the LEGO Community Team.
One of the first initiatives that they had was creating sets that the fan community really wanted, like re-releasing vintage sets. The "first" was arguably the #10000 Guarded Inn (re-release of #6067). At the time, all 5-digit set numbers starting with "1" were supposedly reserved for LEGO Direct.
The oldest reference I know of for the term "Direct To Consumer" is from 2000 from Brad Justus, describing LEGO Direct:
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=463
DaveE
Lego retail stores
[email protected]
Fulfilled by other retailers (TRU and Target don't actually carry the exclusives, they take orders from Lego and ship them out directly).
Although I kind of agree that any set sold without an intermediary could be thought of as a "D2C sale". The relationship between TLG and LBR confuses that a little - more so perhaps than in the days of LEGO Direct.
"D2C" as an expression is in my mind a marketing abbreviation, so Lego may never have meant it to apply (but maybe someone in their team decided it would be the trendy thing to do)
Thanks all.