Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
It also has to be complete. There are two ways of checking this. You could just the count the bricks and compare what you find with an inventory. The easiest way of doing this requires you to open all the bags. Once you've done this, you've destroyed most of the premium value attached to it being BNIB, so you might as well make it. The other second way is just to make it anyway.
It's a bit like Schrodinger's cat. You thought quantum theory was easy?
I thought it would be a laugh for the forum to decide, call it the lego factor if you will.
On the other hand, LEGO bricks are a toy, designed primarily for children. Is it therefore any wonder that a child would be similarly horrified by the thought of stashing sets in a cupboard, never to be made?
Build it,its such an awesome set.
Its the only discontinued modular that I realy want to have.
Would have bought it for 210 without hesitation but 300,meh.
This. If you keep it an open it you can still sell it later (and keep the box and Im guessing they will help narrow down the 'used' vs 'new' price difference).
For me, it is far better to have it now then sell it than to sell it and then want it later on when it is likely more expensive than what you bought the original one for.
It also has to be complete. There are two ways of checking this. You could just the count the bricks and compare what you find with an inventory. The easiest way of doing this requires you to open all the bags. Once you've done this, you've destroyed most of the premium value attached to it being BNIB, so you might as well make it. The other second way is just to make it anyway."
Huh? - it's early and I'm tired but this statement makes no sense whatsoever...
At what stage was there any question regarding the legitimacy of its sealed status? Wouldn't the more logical method be to accurately weigh the sealed set? Obviously the weight of 2.14 kg of dog kibble is exactly the same as 2.14 kg of clean fresh brick... But using this methodology and lime of thought there would be no market whatsoever for aftermarket sealed LEGO sets...
Apologies if I'm missing some kind of sarcasm, irony or humour...
If you don't understand, read around these boards. Seemingly sealed sets have been found that have obviously been opened because selected pieces (or all of them) are missing. That includes sets purchased from legitimate mainstream retailers - and the set here didn't have that benefit. OK, so perhaps the risk is small but, like all scams, once something is proven to be possible, more people will try it and get better at it.
Yes, there was an element of humour intended. People frequently ask whether they should build something or keep it as an investment. Sets are made to be made, and I think that's what you should do with them. So, some people also buy them as an investment. Fine, if that's what you want to do, but don't switch course mid-stream. If you bought something to build it, do so, even if it was a while ago. You've already made the build / invest decision.
As for the secondary market, that is a problem for those who wish to use it. There are people sitting on "sealed sets" that aren't what they seem to be. Caveat emptor.
And please, let's not start an argument - it happens. Sometimes.
Another problem with older sets is that it's harder to replace missing parts. If something is missing from a new set, TLG will generally replace it; for something that's older, they may not be able to because the part is no longer in stock.
;D