Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I see there are too many MISB Lego ads in Ebay.
I am buying Legos after a long time. Last I bought some 1994-1997's Technic set off Ebay for very reasonable amount (£36 for 8880, £58 for 8479 etc. - all used sets though).
Some Ebay items are way more expensive than shops - for models which are still available.
I actually dislike people buying Lego just for investment. This prevents lots of other people who actually want to play with the set!
If a set that sold out was purchased only by people who opened and played with the set, how does that prevent others from buying the set to play with it? It seems to me there would be no sets to buy on the secondary market to play with, so that would prevent "lots of other people who actually want to play with the set" from playing with the set.
People who want to play with the set can buy the set just as easily as the people who purchase it just for investment...the same stores and opportunities are available to us all.
Am I misunderstanding something here?
I guess Lego releases finite number of each sets. Some people just buy sets as soon as they are released. Then they don't play with those themselves. They hoard it just for higher resale value.
Because these sets are snapped from finite supply, the people actually want to play with them (once they are vanished from shops) will not get hold of them unless they are ready to pay over odds (i.e. buy at an inflated price from those who bought it just for the investment).
But I don't know (is there any statistics) what proportion of buyers are like this. If this is a small number then it not an issue. However, if this is a large number, then what I said is quite true.
$.02
To quote Thomas Hildern from Fallout: New Vegas, who provided one of my favorite quotes:
"Too many people have opinions on things they know nothing about. And the more ignorant they are, the more opinions they have."
I agree with what you said, and that is how it works, they said so during the Lego documentary on National Geographic, that they tailor production based on demand. So if one set is selling better than expected, they can quickly produce more of it.
The irony is that secondary market prices would probably be far higher if it were not for re-sellers.
Supply and demand is the cornerstone of most free market economic models...
Some people here have very strong opinions on both sides of the argument, but for the most part all of those people have very maturely agreed to disagree and moved on.
But to answer your question quoted above, the percentage of Lego sold to adults, according to TLG itself, remains in the low single digits, so as you said, since it "is a small number ... it is not an issue."
Hasn't the government already been threatening to take our guns.
(Presuming you live in the US)
What you're saying is that some resellers, those who do things the way you think they should be done, are "good". Other resellers, who don't do what you think should be done, are "bad".
What difference does it make if it is 10 days or 10 years? A seller is free to price their product at any price they like, and a buyer is free to either buy, or to not buy.
The judgement you display is reflective of the "entitlement" attitude common among some people today, that somehow you're entitled to being protected against things, in this case sellers who are charging more than you think they should. Your comment that Amazon should "do something" about it betrays that.
I know that you buy up a lot of sets for resale, but guess what, I am not lumping you in with the "bad" resellers. Again, I'm talking mainly about the guys who buy up popular kids toys, especially around the holidays and then try flipping them for way above retail. These guys don't even care about collecting, they're in it all for profit. Does that make me a socialist? No, it just makes me a guy who cares about being fair minded.
resellers have every right to do so, but its a little frustrating for the average collector when the big bargain is sold out because a bunch of people baught 20 at a time.
I'll admit i'm not a resller, and yes i've only just gotten back into lego.
but i'm realistic when it comes to what sets i can get.
Theres good and bad sides to it, and the good sides certainly out weigh the bad.
The resellers get a little over upset over someone complaining about them, this site isnt about taking sides, and everyones opinion is as valid as the next guys, regardless of if they are only recently back into it, or have been for 20 years.
if you like a set enough, pay RRP for it.
if you're waiting for it to be discounted, then you run the same risk resellers do.
I am not a reseller either, but the main criticisms that are levelled at resellers, i.e. target holiday periods for increased sales etc, isn't that what all good retailers do? lol
its just frustrating for the average collector who is trying to buy for the enjoyment of lego, not the investment.
as said, theres a bunch of benefits to what these people do too
I think I know where Mathew is going with his argument. The Lego Super Hero sets are probably a good example. They were released right before Xmas, and were quickly consumed (by both normal consumers and by resellers). The Funhouse in particular was a rare set to find. Resellers sold these sets for high amounts leading up to Xmas day. I'm not saying it was right or wrong, or who is to "blame" for retailers not having a copy of this set for every single person who wanted/needed/deserved it, but I think that's an example Mathew is frustrated with.
I will say that I understand your point, however may I suggest that point is colored by you being a fan and collector of Lego?
In my real life job, where I earn most of my money, I have no love or passion for the stuff I sell, they are just widgets (computer equipment, if you're curious). I'm sure if I went onto a computer geek forum and talked about the latest Intel Processor like it was just a pile of plastic and wires to make money on, I'd get flamed there too. :)
So consider that a reseller who has no love for Lego, or any toy, who is just flipping them for profit, is just making a living like everyone else. They actually have a term for such a person (I'm one of them), it is called a Yankee Trader:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_traders
Basically such a person makes money because someone, somewhere, wants something, and doesn't know where to go find it. The ultimate buyer could, if he/she wished, probably could get the same deal the reseller did, but for whatever reason, doesn't.
Just some food for thought.
Yet today, they are going for $100 and up... Even the next day, they were $50 online and quickly rose to $70, where I sold most of my copies of the set. So who's fault is that? Walmart, for not "giving away" a set to everyone who wanted one? The consumer for not getting out of the house at midnight on Thanksgiving Day to go fight Walmart traffic? My fault for doing so, buying up 20 of them, and wanting to make something for my efforts? Or perhaps no one's fault... That is just a free market at work...
I also sometimes buy items with my daughters money. Not just Lego, anything I judge to have a profit in it. She is 3. She has probably got 40% more money in the bank than she would have had did I not do this. I have a responsibility as her Father to do whatever I can to ensure she gets the best start in life. Period. Who knows what the future holds?
But I must also add that I would never have a trolley full of discounted Lego and leave some dissapointed kid stood there because I have just had the lot. His pleasure is more important. But if that kid is dissapointed because his parents thought they could just go out the week before Christmas and buy him the item he has been asking for since September, then as unfortunate as that is, it is not for me to worry about.
However, I do dislike the blatant self-centered attitude of some of the resellers.
Big draw of 2509 is that it is a dragon which they aren't making anymore in the line. However, I believe there is a new dragon coming out later this year in a big set. Could be like the skeleton faction from Castle a few years ago. Skeletons were phased out in favor of the trolls which made them skyrocket in price.
2509 is already selling between $45-$55 on ebay. I am not sure where you are getting that it is selling at $25 right now.
@pumperx
I would definitely buy them at $25.
Just an interesting observation.
Conversely, the UCS Obi-Wan Starfighter has been out awhile and it's not that popular either (but it is 4 times more affordable).
So a few questions:
1) Who has purchased this set?
2) What are their thoughts regarding this set (is my analysis off-base)?
3) What is the probability of this set being EOL'd before the end of this year?
I just don't see it being available as long a period as the other UCS SW sets...