Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I think it originally came from a Shepherd who got so tired of eating Lamb that he thought adding some mint would add a different taste so that he could carry on eating.
The rest is history
What is cranberry sauce like in the UK? In the US, there are two kinds: the "real" kind, made from boiling cranberries with sugar and sometimes herbs (e.g. rosemary), which is usually more tart than sweet, and a jelly sold in cans (but still labeled as a sauce), which is usually more sweet than tart.
My wife is a canner, so we eat apple, cranberry, and other sauces with meat all the time. Cranberry in particular is really good with pork.
I'm still feeling like we're in very early innings. Everybody made fun of my mass media comment, when I stated that you'd see many 1st page google search news stories when Lego investing became bubblish. We don't see that now which means the average Joe on Main St. USA has not joined/ruined the party yet.
When we get toppy you'll see news stories in the mainstream media outlets about rags to riches with Lego. Once that happens, I'll seriously consider making a change. Everyone should be asking themselves, if so many people are turning their houses into Lego stores, why no news. Here's the answer - we're in very early innings and there is no story (that they know about).
Whether it be sustainable in 10 years time? Who knows, but I have fingers in other pies to ensure I can still enjoy my turkey.
I often get mad at people who are financially undisciplined and perpetually complain about money. But then I remember that we need fincancially retarded people in our word. They serve a very important purpose.
My response was that it wasn't as laughable as offering 7 x my annual wage when I first asked about a mortgage in 2000. So I whacked £20,000 of lego on my credit cards, ended up negotiating interest which was as low as the banks base rate as I said I would go bankrupt if they didn't play it my way, so it ended up being cheaper than a bank loan! . I wouldn't go as far as saying I was 'financially retarded' though. Credit cards all paid off and cut up now. Looking back on it now it was the banks that were financially incompetent.
As for Lego reselling, I don't do it just for the money. It wouldn't be worth it to me if I was selling barbie dolls, but I would like to tone it down some. Selling off the losers is the bad part. Avoid that in you should be good. I don't know about loading up on 100s of the same set though. One bad pick could mean a lot of work.
Time is the key. For me I have a total of $200 invested, but an inventory over 50k that has built up over about 8 years. Still have about 6 years till the tuition bills start to come in and figure if I do nothing more until then, it should still go up another 100%. Most of what I sell is nisb but started out buying bulk lots and then selling complete sets (thank goodness for Bricklink!)
Not sure what the hourly rate of return would be but I figure the time is less than what a lot spend watching baseball/football/basketball in a given year. I would rather go for a bike ride :)
Play well!
I approach LEGO as a nice-to-have upside. If my inventory appreciates in value and I can make some money, great. If the aftermarket tanks and nobody wants LEGO, I'll have some great sets to play with even if their cash value is $0.
I'm also surprised that some people are touting Lego as a viable investment vehicle, as an alternative to traditional investments. Are these people serious? Let's say you have $50k-$100k or more to invest each year. Even $20k. Are you really going to invest that in Lego? Selling that much each year is a part time job (or worse)! Not to mention all of the record keeping you need to do for tax purposes, since ebay will issue you a 1099 form for sales over $20k. I'm assuming Amazon also issues a 1099. Unless your full time job is selling toys and/or or you have a fully-staffed toy-selling business, Lego is probably not a realistic investment vehicle on any large scale if you have a full-time job. It's simply too much work, and possibly more risky than traditional investments.
While it may be true that you can net a better ROI on Lego than many equities (currently- who knows what the future holds), the reality is you do quite a bit of work to get that, and the scalability is just not there for most people.
I know plenty of people who look rich, make 400k per year, have a negative net worth, and are 2 paychecks away from Bankruptcy. How much money you make is far less important than how much money you keep. The vast majority of people in the USA keep nothing.
If all you keep at the end of each week is a "paid for" Pet Shop, my hat is off to you. Lego has proven to be an appreciating asset over time. It's a small part of my portfolio but I'm confidant that it will prove to be a powerful asset if handled carefully. And at the end of the day, it's one of the coolest exciting toys ever created. Loved by all.
#21103 is now sold out at europe s@h, gone from call to check
#10224 expected date continues to be pushed back further now 11th Nov
Guess ill pick a couple up lol
Wouldn't the GE be the obvious choice to stock up on?
So, I will continue... Obviously, there are several factors involved to investing in Lego. I don't feel that it is too much work selling Lego. I "waste" far more time on this forum than I do actually selling Lego. I would never quit my full-time job to sell Lego, unless selling Lego nets me more money. I only sell to supplement my income and nothing more. There are many people that are out of work in the US and I would have more respect for a person reselling Lego to support their family, than I person who just wants to collect a check from the government.
Hindsight is always 20/20, but I wished I had more capital to invest in #4842 Hogwarts Castle. I bought as much as I could (even damaged boxes) and I would have bought more if I had the money to invest.
I will tell you that I made most of my money from used Harry Potter sets and small damaged box sets. I would find crushed sealed boxes on clearance from time to time and made a killing selling those.
Plan for college fund with LEGO? Check this story out first....
http://www.businessinsider.com/family-spends-100000-on-beanie-babies-2013-7?op=1
I look at the LEGO craze of the last decade in a very different way than many of you newbies (I say that because I've been at it for 54 years)...
But the good times with LEGO.... will they last for ever? Or will there be another Sports Card bubble waiting to burst in the future as there was late in the 20th century....
http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2010/03/the_great_baseball_card_bubble.html
Smart investors seem to go against the general herd mentality... and where there's a herd... there usually trouble on the horizon. From that previous link I saw this quote...
"Baseball cards first became seen as promising investments, setting the stage for a decade of speculation and overproduction."
And when I think of overproduction... I think of the Collectible Minifigs (CMFs)... the LEGO factory in China is probably working 3 shifts to satisfy the "collectors frenzy" in North America, Europe and Asia. In 20 years time the amount of these available on the secondary market will still be staggering... as all you mint box collectors will likely be disappointed with your investments...
Oh well there's always those Princess Diana Beanie Babies...
Some lucky seller is selling a "rare" pair for $652,000....
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2-Princess-Diana-Beanie-Babies-Authenticated-Super-Rare-The-Ghost-Version-/251533925380?pt=Beanbag_Plush_US&hash=item3a90971c04
... oh wait... that was just the highest of the 1,343 Beanie Babies on Ebay right now... others such as this one for a $1.99 "Buy It Now" price... get no takers at the opening 75 cent bid (only 1 day left in auction for this bargain!!!)
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Princess-Diana-Beanie-Baby-with-Clear-case-/121461465375?pt=Beanbag_Plush_US&hash=item1c47aae11f
I am of the opinion that more and more investors are entering the LEGO market (there are even Facebook pages on LEGO investing)... where ever hobbyists encounter investors... there is likely trouble on the horizon when the folks who are in it not for the hobby, but for the investment... the investment herds will then go elsewhere on to a new subject for investor frenzy... thus leaving hobbyists disgruntled and angry. While I'm not saying that there may be a LEGO bubble waiting to burst... I am saying that caution should be the order of the day. For every wildly successful 10179 Millennium Falcon... or 10185 Green Grocer... there are hundreds of sets that are not quite as successful.
So before you go investing into your children's future in LEGO... think it over very very carefully...
"***Own Two of the Rarest Princess's Ever Produced***" [in comic sans]
Fuck me, you're asking $652,000 for something and you can't even pluralize 'Princess' correctly or use a font other than comic sans?
That said, a good understanding of bubble dynamics is a valuable tool. IMO we are well below the radar with Lego investing at this time.
WE DON"T FEAR a bubble in Lego. We pray for a bubble as it would present a gold-mine exit opportunity.
What is the intrinsic value of a beanie baby? You cannot open a beanie baby up and sell off the stuffing inside and the outer fabric for much money.
The basic lego bricks will be worth something, unless the entire hobby collapses and nobody wants lego at all. I wasn't disappointed with my investments in S1 zombies (all three of them!), S3 elves or S6 romans. I sold off the roman torso and legs for twice what I paid for the complete minifigs, leaving me with the silver helmets and shields to go with my S10 roman body parts.
While there may be large volumes of CMF on the market, investing in specific ones can pay dividends. I agree, although when investors decide to dump and run, there can be bargains to be had. I also agree to be careful in what you invest in. Don't invest in everything, but know what you are investing in.
That said, Lego bricks have intrinsic value whereas cardboard pictures (and to a lesser extent, styrofoam pellets in animal bags) do not have that much value in and of themselves. Lego will always have some value. Just maybe not the wild increases in value we have seen in the past.
I'm mid-40s and I reckon people have speculated on buying new toys for investment for the most part of my life.
Other than the storage costs, etc. I won't lose money on any of the LEGO sets I have. Worst case, I think I would be able to sell most of them near RRP. So, even if the market bottoms out it will never truly hit rock bottom to the point that I lose lots of money.
The result of this culture of LEGO is that newborns today will soon get there hands on DUPLO and start the process of becoming a buyer. There aren't many children these days craving beanie babies or sportscards.
Consider this the new normal, but it's not a bubble.
I'm not a hard core reseller, but I dabble in it. The safety net for me is the intrinsic value of the parts. If I can't get an ROI I want on a set for resale, I can always part it out and cash out that way. So I agree with the sentiments of caution - if you are going to invest, do it wisely. Personally, I think any resellers that aren't Lego hobbyists are doomed to fail. If you don't understand the motivation of builders and collectors, you won't have insight as to which sets will appreciate. Lego produces 400+ products a year, and maybe 5% of those will appreciate enough in a couple years to make reselling Lego a better choice than investing in stocks.
None sold on BL for #6390, suggesting current listing prices are too high, or not wanted.
£500 for new #6970 (1 sale), £90 used (a few sales). Being able to get £500 for that set is not bad at all, being able to get £25K for 50 of them is probably going to be much harder.
I think part of the reason people don't want the older stuff is that it is not that great compared to new. Sure, there is the nostalgia factor, but for me I'd normally pick a new set over the old.
Will people in the future want today's sets? Who knows. However, a clued up reseller doesn't purchase then leave sets in the cupboard for 20 years. He lets them rise in price then sells when the price increases (not necessarily the price) starts to fall below an acceptable level.