Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
A: From rocao, finite resources mean priorities within a wanted list based on all sorts of factors.
B: From Matthew, TH was retired with very little warning, arguably early, and out of order.
A + B = every reason to appreciate how some people missed out.
Normally I'd ignore these sorts of spats as symptomatic of all the internet robs from reasonable discussion, but I absolutely despise the sort of tone coming out where poor souls unfortunate enough to not be able to buy whatever they want whenever they want would be sniggered at were the real collectors to lower their noses long enough to acknowledge their existence.
Before this, a nice pattern was beginning to appear. Now it's clear it was no such thing, but all I've ever been saying is that it wasn't unreasonable to think a pattern was being established, even though that has now been shown to be wrong. I can't see how anyone can deny that.
Though I see your point that it is likely gone for good, then again it still COULD ome back for one more year (or half year) Depends what is meant by '....out of order'. You are presuming that the TH was viewed by LEGO like all other mods, but it was really not IMO. It was bigger and more expensive than a standard mod. As for 'little warning' there have been plenty of sets in the past that retired 'with little warning' depending on who you talk to. Some are legit gripes (like #3222 and #9465), others are perceived abruptness (like 10228, or every other set that gets EOL'd in what appears is a normal cycle -like city sets or MF going away)
I think @CCC said it best: 'It retired earlier than expected' and by 'expected 'it means people made assumptions about how long it would be out. And people should know what happens when they 'ass-u-me'.
LEGO has never said a set will be out for this long or that long, we are all basing it on previous expectancy. The Target exclusive MF #9465 The Zombies set probably 'should' have been out for 2 to 2.5 years (timeline of MF line), but it was gone in about 6 months, maybe a bit longer. Then Target puts out the Orc Forge that seems to last forever... There is no rhyme or reason and, unless you work in LEGOs dept that decides product runs, you do not know.
Heck even if you do work in that dept, who knows? It sounds like VW Van and DS are now around for another year. But I would not tell people to wait on it, get one now if you want them. Especially in the US as there are no discounts (but the VW van has had two promo periods now where buying it got you a mini VW Bus polybag).
And for those who claim to know when LEGO will precisely retire a set (other than 'sometime this year', look into that crystal ball and provide me the lottery numbers for tonight would you?
I totally get that your average person doesn't set aside the money to buy all the exclusive and "hard to find" sets. Even those people who DO have the money, don't actually buy them all, that is a rare thing I'm sure. (I have no source, my gut just tells me that people don't do that, tell me if you disagree).
Have you considered that LEGO planned to have some of those sets gone sooner rather than later, SSD for example, to make room in the inventory, store shelves, and production, for sets that were newer and would move faster?
SSD was several years old, many people already have it, so the number of people who will buy it Christmas 2014 is a subset of all LEGO customers. A brand new set, on the other hand, has 100% of the possible customers of a LEGO set in that price range.
All I'm saying is that your suggestion that LEGO fudged up might not be accurate. It might well have been planned that way. I have no idea, just tossing it out there.
Put another way, if TLG releases 2 modulars a year and you only have the money for 1 per year, then you're simply going to have to pick which one you like and not be sad that you miss the other one.
If someone wanted GE and TH, fair enough, there was 2 years in which to buy TH, 4 in which to buy GE. If in that time you didn't get both, so be it. We can't have everything we want after all. :)
Being mad at TLG for not producing a set until you specifically can afford it is a bit nuts, quite frankly. And there will always be another set coming out after that. If you missed TH, so be it, DA will be out in January, buy that one instead.
I didn't have any Palace Cinema in my inventory a few weeks ago... I have 2 of them now, 1 for sure to build and 1 to sell later to pay for that one (maybe 1 year, maybe 3, who knows, it is just one set so I don't worry too much).
This is actually a great way to get people off their duff and go order that set that was a "some day" purchase. TH probably didn't sell all that well, it never felt like it did to me, but I have no evidence to back that up.
So it was a good set to send out the door to both make room for a better selling modular, and to kick up some sales of other items from people who were sitting on the sidelines.
FB and GE were 4 years.
That implies that PS would be 4 years as well, assuming you believe in such patterns, but the truth is, production plans are rarely made because of such things.
LEGO is a product, a physical good that is manufactured and sold based on demand for said product. TLG is still making Death Stars because they continue to sell, not because it fits a "pattern". Other sets go away after 1 year, perhaps due to a replacement, perhaps due to poor sales, there are many reasons.
Were I in charge of production at LEGO, a "pattern" is the last thing on my mind. What I want to know is what is selling and what are stores ordering. If something isn't selling, I couldn't care less what pattern exists, I want a new product that DOES sell.
I think what annoys some of us is when a set goes EOL and people freak out as if they were somehow caught blindside or otherwise entitled by TLG to have access to the set. If someone is a member of this forum and follows the threads somewhat, there is usually a pretty good idea of what is going and when it is going. Sure, everyone can't buy everything, I get that and I think others do to, but most people on a budget can still get most of what they want as long as they pay attention. I'll give you an example. I have not yet purchased TB. I like it. It's cool, but I haven't pulled the trigger. I have purchased a lot of newer sets instead, (PR and Tumbler come to mind.) If TB goes, and I don't have it, I have no one to blame but myself. At one point I had the funds, but I bought a newer set instead. I wanted that set more. I think those people who are in this some boat then feel slighted by TLG are the ones that annoy me.
I agree if the sales aren't there, then the set won't last long. But you'd also sort of expect a pattern, only if sales also followed that pattern. I think TH is a lovely set and has a lot of fun details, but the cost ruined it. People see it as too expensive, instead of a better value for the more pieces and whatnot. If they had continued the same trend of mid 100s, who knows what we'd be talking about now.
Priorities can come and go, but LEGO will always produce new sets and replace old sets. Get what you can, when you can. If you don't have money for MSRP, you won't have money for aftermarket prices, especially on the Modulars.
Someone mentioned bricklinking it after it EOL..okay. If you go into bricklink for FB or any of the newer ones, the prices per piece is almost double-triple what the MSRP is. And that's just right now. Who knows what it would be like if rarer pieces were involved (like GG/CC). So think about that.
And with LEGO showing the last 3 on the back of the box, that means PS would be on its way out too sooner than later. The last three will be PC, PR, and now DO.
I will have to take FB, GE and TH out of storage and start building, has anyone got a CC and GC they don't want ;-)?
The ones still available are all at the RRP of $300AUD ($262USD) and so they sit there, as most of us AFOL already had our fill.
Anyway I am not suggesting they are not gone, but in Australia we tend to get a last minute batch of sets like this from time to time. Diagon Alley was the last, with Target here having some stock 3-6 months after it had disappeared from US stores & web sites, although that was partly due to the very high RRP of $279.99 (Back when out $ was at parity with the USD).
Also one of the "Toy World" stores I mentioned has 10 available at RRP plus only $10 shipping.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/NEW-LEGO-10224-Town-Hall-from-Mr-Toys-Toyworld-/321589052560?pt=AU_LEGO&hash=item4ae0338490
So I suppose for anyone in Australia who hasn't got one yet, it is probably best to get one now as they are available at close to RRP online and I'd guess once all these sell, prices will climb back to $400 fast.
With the mention of "pot odds", I was hopeful I had finally found someone that appreciates partaking in a good prop bet, too.
Did you pull the trigger? and if so, was it really the GE contents in the box?
While they could have been in the store at some point likely a major TRU like downtown Chicago or New York (Tags seem to stay on shelves until the set is officially removed from the system and even then tags seem to linger) I would say it would be more likely that they are also returns than just sitting there gather dust on the shelf all of this time, even at $190. But hey anything is possible.
I'm just saying anyone that sees one a shelf better take it to the counter and open it there, or take it home and open it, or weigh it against another box for any weight discrepancy. The odds of someone tinkering with the box are higher the more sought after the set.
http://www.pixmania.co.uk/lego-exclusives/lego-lego-creator-town-hall-10224/14832436-a.html