Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
Isn't plenty of time to buy it? (If someone was late to the party then I understand)
As for the condition of whether or not it's retired, I'd rather not attach conditions to complicate a relatively straight forward bet. We're both working from the same information: by all accounts it is retired and I know nothing of the contrary. What if some crazy person decides to corner the market on Town Halls like #41999 and single handedly inflates the price an additional $100+? For me, whatever happens is part of the gamble.
So how about qty average bricklink selling price for a new Town Hall in November on 11/8/2015, o/u $500? Winner receives a NIB Town Hall from the other, or the cash equivalent of the bet deciding price. That will actually be the average selling price for 11/1 - 11/8, but that's a small window and not likely to have some price shock event. This does open the possibility of rigging the bet, but I trust you and hope you trust me (we could exclude severely outlying price points, if you wish). The same thing about trust goes for the need to proxy a set. That seems like a lot of unnecessary shipping.
But with TH it's that Lego retired it way before anyone could have expected. My beef is that FB was retired last year, GE was next and I was expecting to retire next, so after that it should be PS, and then TH. I foolishly ran out of time to get GE, but I should still have had plenty of time to get TH. Boo TLG!
Enotoga's original comment and my offer to take you up on the wager were both most assuredly predicated on the current assumption that TH is, in fact, retired. Unexpectedly. It is for this very reason that I am so bullish on it's appreciation potential. I am not interested in gambling on whether or not it is retired, only what it will be worth if it is.
As for which indice to use, when I sell my copies it will be on eBay here in the United States. The global market represented on Bricklink is not indicative of how my investment will perform so I use the data over at Brickpicker as my barometer. If we were to wager, that's what I would want it based on.
The proxy comment was sort of a joke, we've traded before with no problems.
-Not everyone has been collecting LEGO for the past 3-4 years
-There are those that procrastinate, thinking ' well if it is out that long it will be out longer so I can wait to purchase it'
-People are 'racing' to get their first copies, and then there are speculators buying them up since they know they are likely gone for good. This is due to the fact that in the US these sets no longer go on sale. This may also go to point 2. You could have newbies that got back into LEGO that assumed, incorrectly, that these get discounted in the US, therefore wait until someone puts them on sale or clearance. Neither of which will happen with 'exclusives' from LEGO, at least not in the US and only will change when LEGO decides to stop punishing US buyers for TLG's inability to price fairly across the globe. At least that appears to be the reason for lack of discounts on these sets now.
It is this discount restriction which will also play into the remaining stocks of these sets scooped up right near EOL. Speculators figure that even at retail that they can make a killing on the secondary market as long as they can flip them right away for a decent buck (and I'm sure some are with TH, and definitely are with FB and HH as well. GE, well time will tell, seems to be a bit slow moving right now)
Brickpicker data relies on TeraPeak, which as I understand it scrapes auction listings for relevant search terms in addition to the ones that are properly identified. This introduces the possibility of false positives, which the Brickpicker FAQ says they then attempt to identify and remove. The fact that they need to do this, coupled with whatever flaws exist in their own filtering, underscores that the data is less reliable. Moreover, there are variables in listings on eBay that skew the data: Did the eBay listing include free shipping, so that shipping is built into the price? Did the eBay listing underprice the set but inflate the shipping charge? Was the item damaged but technically still new?
It seems like a situation we might as well avoid when we have concrete data available from Bricklink. Bricklink data is complete and concrete. Copies listed as new on Bricklink are, by and large, new with little damage and do not include shipping. We can change the price guide setting to only display US sales. We can see for ourselves if there are any outliers and remove them.
At any rate, if you want to use them both, that's ok. But it should be that BOTH need to indicate a winner. It doesn't seem fair to award a winner in the OR case. It will be anti-climatic for this to end in a tie, but if you want to include both, I'm pretty firm on this.
Finally, and probably most importantly, 12/31 in no way is "one year's time" or "fall" which was the initial proposition. The first week of November -- 11/1 to 11/8 --meets both those original terms and is a compromise between the beginning of fall and the end of the year you wanted to expand it to. If you'd like to change the time period to 12/31, it's only fair that value be negotiated as well.
I'm still very eager to make this happen. I imagine you are too since you have proven track records on your side and a nice overlay in your cheap entry point :)
I still feel that $500 is probable by 12/31/15 (assuming a retired product) using BP -or- BL as an indice. When I want to know the current value of a set I just go to one or the other and see what comes up and go by that. The numbers they provide are not easily manipulated and leave no room for debate.
These are my conditions and represent the wager I am willing to make.
If you want to run a contest, Jeff and I would be glad to furnish you with eBay sales data for any set(s) you desire. We will let you pick through the listings and remove any you feel are questionable. Let Jeff or I know if we can help you in any way.
Thanks for your time...Ed Mack
P.S.- The Town Hall is retired. ;-)
'Reliable' wasn't the perfect word, but i still think it's correct. The underlying variations in product condition and shipping price structuring on eBay, overlaid by the need for accurate terapeak and BP filtering introduces more moving parts with less clarity.
But like I said, we can do 12/31, it just seems fair that if you're going to extend the date and include the busiest toy spending holiday of the year, you should be willing to allow for a higher price.
How about Brickpicker showing a value of $575 by 12/31/15? Simple enough?
One thing you should keep in mind though, Bricklink caters to a smaller and more savvy LEGO consumer, one that knows the proper pricing of sets and pieces. eBay on the other hand will attract all types of buyers, savvy and novices alike. Those novices sometimes pay way above the going rate on sets, maybe because of ignorance or laziness, but many times it's about the ease and protection that eBay offers. The point is, there will be higher valued sold auctions on eBay, but they are real and should be counted.
An item is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. eBay doubles Bricklink in most LEGO sales, so if a larger majority of people are paying the higher price, it is my opinion, that is the more accurate price. Maybe an average of the two values is the solution.
Let me know if we can be of help...
I do not read this thread for re-seller discussions about what the average price will be at X date in the future. I don't read the large re-seller thread for exactly that reason.
Stop getting your tinsel in an tangle, folks.
But I would not be surprised to see it come back in another set at a later date
Is 2 years not long enough? TH has been out for 2 years... you've had plenty of time... FB was out far longer than anyone expected, 4 years is not normal for LEGO...
To reiterate the don't-wait-for-it-to-be-on-the-perfect-sale preaching, had you gotten it last month, you'd have gotten 2x VIP points plus the toy workshop, or roughly the equivalent of $160, which is 20% off. On an exclusive, that's basically a straight flush, and simply not beatable without incredible luck.
To repeat what so many have said here multiple times (and me twice in this same note!), if you want a set, get the set.
To be fair....not everyone gets in at the same time, and many people budget their buying on what was thought as a linear succession line for the modulars. I missed out on TH fair and square (and I'm ok with it)....but it was on my list, albeit a bit farther down.
Also, I visited three different LBR stores last month while travelling, and they were already sold out of GE and TH.
I'm not filled with righteous indignation, though.....nor, can I fault TLG for EOL'ing a set that mismatched in price/production/demand until it's actually retired. hahaha
(just trying to hit all the topics in this thread) ;-)