Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I've never had any SW set. I like Town/City, anything that is realistic - Pirates, Castle, Creator, and only some unrealistich themes - space [not all].
That was one of the reasons I lost interest in Lego around 1999, because City sets became ridiculously simplified and most of the "ordinary" themes was dropped.
Saying that, I have picked up a few of my favourite characters' minifigs, as I can appreciate a good translation of character to minifig form!
(I'm not saying I'm against the SW re-releases;))
Generally, it just seems weird to want to act out a film, seems to limit the imagination somewhat.
Now that it exists, and I have the money to buy it, it's a bit anti-climactic. I own a few Star Wars sets (no X-Wing), not a lot, and I don't feel the need to purchase many more. I get a lot more out of non-licensed space-y themes like Space Police 3, Atlantis and the upcoming Alien Conquest. For the money, Star Wars sets provide very little amusement.
Some of the figures are neat - the droids are definitely fun, but I'm more likely to part out Star Wars sets than any other theme.
I'm sure there are Plenty of AFOL's who don't care for Star Wars. There are even some like myself who collect space and still don't care for Star Wars.
I also dislike (and realize I might be the only one) how focused TLG is on minifigures recently -- offering an "exclusive" one in nearly every set. I realize TLG is in the business of designing sets to maximize revenue, but it all seems too calculated and contrived to me.
Having said all this, I do think Lego is in a sort of renaissance with respect to the great designs across themes they have been putting out in the past few years.
The amount of money generated by the SW theme is astronomical and helped TLG to rebuild it's empire (now #4 in Toy Sales, correct Huw?). With that it was able to reinvigorate excitement in its other brands and themes while attracting new lines (PoP, Indiana Jones, Toy Story, etc.).
Along with all of the new SW sets and the themes that followed, TLG was able to create new parts that are helping to redesign old LEGO themes as well as create new ones.
Again, I am not a collector of SW LEGO, but I am thankful to those that are. If not for them, the landscape of LEGO would be drastically different.
"In 2003, The LEGO Group faced a budget deficit of 1.4 billion DKK (220 million USD at then current exchange rates), causing president Poul Plougmann to be fired and Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen to take over. In the following year, almost one thousand employees were laid off, due to budget cuts.
However, in October, 2004, as The LEGO Group faced an even larger deficit, Kristiansen also stepped down as president, while placing 800,000 DKK of his private funds in the company.
In 2005, The LEGO Group reported a 2004 net loss of DKK 1,931 million on a total turnover, including LEGOLAND amusement parks, of DKK 7,934 million."
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300540369665&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT#ht_1121wt_1141
Used 10179 UCS MF sets are going for over $1000 right now, and MISB for $200-300 more than that. It's getting ridiculous, to be honest. Even 2-3 years ago when I was completing my SW collection it wasn't anything like as bad as this. I'm genuinely not sure I'd collect SW if I had to start from scratch now......
but not including clone wars cartoon~
Post edited by @Matthew 04/04/11 16:55 GMT
Reason: Merged two consecutive posts.
I also really miss the cheap Star Wars "pocket money" sets of about 2 to 8 pounds sterling though... They were a nice way of picking up decent figs without having to cough up a shed load of money. Then of course is the fact that every set seems to have an Exclusive miniature figure. It seems that the only CW ones that aren't exclusive are Anakin, Asohka, some of the jedi, droids and clones. Every other one only seems to be available in one or two sets. Even main characters are limited to one set, like Asajj Ventress (which my little brother bugs me about wanting) who is only just getting a second release wheras Anakin appears in a multitude of sets.
Probably quite a good investment too if you look at what the 'big' Falcon is going for!
Not a clone wars fan.
My wife.
I'm not a fan of the clone wars, but I will get my hands on some exceptional figs in that series (ARF trooper, Mandalorians).
I think that SW sets would be great in ways that: 1) there are quite a few rare & interesting pieces to add to your collection; 2) having that said, such pieces could inspire pretty cool and different building techniques; and 3) how can you NOT ignore the minifigs?? :-)
Well, it sounds like I'm a huge fan of SW sets, but my interest is mostly in CITY/TOWN, buildings & houses. I'm thinking of getting the Death Star some day-hopefully soon!-but that means I'd better save money for that.
Personally I have never owned and can't see myself ever owning one. Creator and City FTW.
Somehow I don't like the sets, I have only 2 I think. And they are expensive, thanks to the license.
One day I would buy the Death Star...
i mainly collect movie sets and i know star wars is a movie but i just think the sets from hp or potc ect are just so much better
I was disappointed that so many of the BrickMaster sets were Star Wars. I'm hoping that one of the remaining ones will be POTC.
There have been exceptions, however. I bought the T-6 Jedi Shuttle strictly for the Saesee Tiin and Shaak Ti minifigs, and then only because I MOC'd Saesee's Jedi Starfighter and couldn't stand not to have him in it.