Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
When you buy something on eBay, all bets are off, whether you buy from someone who is allegedly in the UK or on the moon.
https://www.gumtree.com/p/other-miscellaneous-goods/batman-tumbler-batmobile-car-batman-joker-lego-mini-figures.-new-sealed-boxes/1142973003
Though looking at his other ads, I have to laugh at the "Famous Super Heroes" title!
Indeed, it makes the owner look like an idiot! If you know what the B stands for then you also know how a Bentley looks.
The products themselves don't claim to be LEGO sets. They aren't fake. As such, and as far as TLG are concerned, that unfortunately means they are probably legitimate, although Warner might have something to say about use of their IP. OK, so TLG might have a legitimate complaint about particular pieces, but not about the set as a whole.
And that would be the end of that apart from a small detail. The seller (and you!) describes them as lego (sic). That's an incorrect description, essentially fraud. This is why TLG fight to keep control of their own trademark and are fussy about just how it is used. When "LEGO" is used in the same way as "Hoover", something like this could be legitimately described in the way the seller has done. Until then, he has to use something else. As it stands, he or she is breaking the law.
I should point out that the shop on the ground floor is a genuine Polish supermarket that has nothing to do with the upstairs floor which is where the Chinese supermarket is located.
LEGO sets are also on a par price-wise with the rest of Europe, although slightly cheaper than in the UK. However, as most other things are considerably cheaper there, that makes them seem expensive for the locals.
Biedronka is as Polish as Lidl is British - it's Portuguese.
My question is about the Lego mini figure sniffing dog. Is said dog...blonde(currently)and does this dog call Warsaw home by chance. I think I know this dog personally although we have never met face to face. Here's to the red and the white , bro!
As for Biedronka, I merely added the comment because of my poorly taken photo which could have suggested they were selling the Chinese stuff. To be correct, it is a Polish supermarket, just like Carrefour and LeClerc, also just down the road from where I am in Poland, but their origins might not be Polish. I can't use my Tesco clubcard here in Poland because it is a Polish supermarket not a British one, so I hope this explains my descriptions.
The difficulties faced by TLG, eh? Yet, you have no problem with Cobi. TLG have a problem with Cobi and have taken them to court. Whose side are you on?
The Polish court ruled that the imitation of another company's products was legitimate particularly where there was a clear indication of the manufacturer, even if the rest of the packaging was similar in size, colour and style. They were talking about Cobi, but that description precisely fits the photograph you posted.
Did you buy a set ? I doubt it - but you know it's poor quality because it's Chinese?
In fact, reviews might criticise their designs a little, but like many other clones, the quality is reasonable. After all, there's no real reason why it shouldn't be.
The point is that Gudi are no different to Cobi - they even make military sets, which are clearly not "knock-offs" of LEGO ones. However, I'm sick and tired of people criticising Chinese clones whilst somehow justifying western ones when there's generally no difference between them.
You can be selective about your focus, but overall there isn't much difference. They all copy each other, but there are so many companies and we each only see a limited selection of them, so we don't even know who has copied who.
1. Boxes normally glued, and you end up ripping the box open.
2. Don't get me started on the use of English on the box and instructions.......
3. Nearly every set has pieces missing, with no after sales at all, so there is nothing you can do and trying to get a refund is next to impossible.
4. Sometimes there are irritations like two left arms or no hands for the minifigures.
5. Pieces very often don't hold together or are impossible to take apart.
6. The finished article has gaps, doesn't fit or just looks poor.
7. Although they haven't ever bought any, the licenced stuff like Minecraft or Marvel looks very odd and that isn't just going to upset TLG.
So from the few sets I have had the misfortune to see up close, quality is poor IMO.
As for which side I am on, if TLG don't make it and it isn't licenced, then I see no problem in getting it, like military sets.
I'll await the criticism which will no doubt be on its way........
But you're right that we shouldn't be selective when discussing this topic. Rather we should be very specific & comprehensive instead by naming each and every Clone brick company, then evaluating each separately. I don't think it would take much time to determine who the legitimate clones companies are and who the counterfeits are.
Yes, I know - which is why I posted about the Polish court's ruling (which predates both sets) that such things are legitimate. People often like to post how a set like that is illegal, or immoral, or counterfeit, or a number of other things that have negative connotations, but when our own courts rule to the contrary, there isn't a lot of point.
It's much simpler than that - there's TLG and there's the rest, although you could probably argue the toss for something like Nanoblocks. At the end of the day, they have all copied both the method of connection and the precise dimensions of LEGO elements, otherwise they wouldn't be "compatible".
"Counterfeit"? Does that cover Gubi? Yes, they've produced a space shuttle, but they also produce other things that TLG wouldn't currently even dream of producing
....and you lied about the Lego minifigure sniffing dog, yah jerk! Clearly you are a snake and not a tiger.
Poles believe home-sourced goods are best, especially when compared to German ones. As a result, quite a lot of German producers have Polish subsidiaries. Whether that makes the products German or Polish is debatable.
And later this year, we'll see #10253. Do you think anybody here will consider that's a copy of the Wange set?
I don't like clones. So what can we do about it? The point is that we chasing the wrong target. I don't know what the right one is, but all the time we pick on the wrong thing, those clones manufacturers are winning. Hey! It's poor-quality Chinese rubbish. No, it's Polish or Canadian or Korean or British. Hey! It's a fake. Maybe, but of a dead set, so it's not trying to deceive anybody after the real thing.
We find our solution in expressing our disgust at these immoral companies who are getting up to all sorts of sharp practices. They're wrong and we have the moral high ground. Solution? It actually doesn't solve anything, does it?
And as they say in Poland.......cokolwiek :)
In fact, there are bootleg sets and figs out there of subjects LEGO has never produced at all. Some of the ones that surprised me the most are Ninjago figs with unique armor and helmet molds based on unused LEGO Universe concept art. Other than poor print quality on Jay and helmet molds that don't quite line up with the eyes, the knock-offs are pretty authentic-looking. These are figs that were never produced, never intended to be produced, and never even revealed to the public except as a single picture. But while knock-off makers may be unscrupulous, they aren't dumb. That one picture, it turns out, was all their designers needed.
Frankly, I think LEGO being produced in Asia doesn't make nearly as much of a difference as LEGO being sold and marketed in Asia, since it's sales and marketing that play the biggest part in making the general public in low-income markets desire the LEGO brand in the first place (and in many cases, lacking the clout to buy the real deal, settle for a cheaper copy). As long as there is a market for LEGO there will be a market for fakes, and copycat brands don't need any kind of "inside track" to LEGO to be able to churn out convincing imitations.
There's a lot of this going on - recent Fords are trying hard to look like an Aston Martin with that grille, Kia are doing the same trying to look like Audi. My Mate has a Peugeot RCZ and goes mad when we refer to it as an "ALDI TT".
The article has a link to reviews of many clone sets, reviewed by an AFOL. Very entertaining read, and quite informative given the vast number of clones and the relatively small sampling of sets reviewed. Some are actually quite nice, others not even fit for building bleachers for minifigs.
my point is, now these fakes are readily available and UK is now flooded, they are getting sold on on the second hand market quite innocently by unaware sellers. It's one thing buying the fakes from China in the first place but then they get moved on second hand...
I do still like my Romance of the Three Kingdoms Ancient China dynasty series of LEGO knockoffs though. They arn'te nearly as good as real LEGO blocks, but I won't hold my breath for TLG to make such a series.
That may cause some brand confusion on the counterfeit market...
Pedi-chlorians?
Or is it the old l / r problem again?