Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
(PS, @TalasAntares, the ^ means that you're replying to the one above ^^ the one above that, etc ... not sure if you didnt realise this)
I wouldn't get too fussed about it ... if you're expecting LEGO (or any other large company) to be grateful for your business, you're only ever going to be disappointed ;-)
^^^ They could if they wanted to (its part of what I do for a living) .. maybe not through sales figures but there are tons of other ways of modelling market behaviours.
And, is it just me, or have the sets that have increased/kept their value the ones associated with games - Batman, HP, Indiana Jones...I reckon the long term playability of the games means people want the sets long after they're discontinued. (I know there's other factors too, such as the themes being good in the first place...but might be why normal, non obsessives chase and pay high prices for these sets...)
So do these sales mean they will lower the price :-DDDDDDDDD
Ah well.
http://hmv.com/hmvweb/navigate.do?pPageID=4893
I find this statement to be disingenous. While manufacturing costs might actually be rising in the far east, they are still considerably lower than they are elsewhere in the world. The fact that Lego's prices continue to rise over time even as they shift more and more of their production to countries with cheap labor would seem to be the reason for the rise in profits. Competitors who have long relied on cheaper far east production might see increased costs but Lego is definitely saving money and increasing profits by turning to cheaper production, not saving money by not.