Shopping at LEGO or Amazon?
Please use our links: LEGO.comAmazon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

The Ghostbusters set passed the Cuusoo Review

«1

Comments

  • tmgm528tmgm528 Member Posts: 457
    !!!!!! YES!!!!!!!
    TXLegoguy
  • CrowkillersCrowkillers Member Posts: 757
    ONLY the 30th anniversary one though...
    TXLegoguy
  • tmgm528tmgm528 Member Posts: 457
    Now if we can just get Sherlock passed...>.<
    margot
  • richlrichl Member Posts: 246
    Just watched the video - brilliant, ECTO-1 and the minifigs! Dammit, I should have picked up #10197 before it EOL'd after all...
    margotlegomattTXLegoguyprevereTheBrickLaddLegoManiacccardgenius
  • margotmargot Member Posts: 2,308
    So awesome!!! And I'm really glad they might still make the female minifig sets.
  • cheshirecatcheshirecat Member Posts: 5,331
    edited January 2014
    Very cool, definately a buy from me. Seemed quite quick too.

    Shame about the land rover, hope something comes from the female sets as they were pretty cool.
  • CrowkillersCrowkillers Member Posts: 757
    edited January 2014
    I think in the end, the Land Rover was just too big... A set like that takes a long time to develop and the entire thing would have needed reworked from the ground up...

    I am thrilled about the Ghostbusters passing...

    I wonder if they'll have it out for Halloween..?

    TXLegoguy
  • andheandhe Member Posts: 3,911
    Just incase anyone was wondering, it's just the figs and Ecto-1, not the fire station. Guess that fits in the price point that these CUUSOO sets seem to be going for.
  • korkor Member Posts: 392
    This is AWESOME!!!!
  • CrowkillersCrowkillers Member Posts: 757
    ^ Yeah, I don't know if we'll ever see a large model come from Cuusoo..
  • LegoFanTexasLegoFanTexas Member Posts: 8,404
    andhe said:

    Just incase anyone was wondering, it's just the figs and Ecto-1, not the fire station. Guess that fits in the price point that these CUUSOO sets seem to be going for.

    Yes, which means that Fire Brigade may get a nice boost in value when this comes out, since it will be about perfect for this set.
    bluemodern
  • Faedian7Faedian7 Member Posts: 50
    Hopefully they don't take too many liberties with the final design. I really loved back to the future but I just don't like the design they came up with for the car.
  • richoricho Member Posts: 3,830
    edited January 2014
    Good news, quite exciting getting Ghostbusters.

    In terms of the next review, I would be most happy with the Japanese architecture. In terms of Sherlock, it would be much better in my view if it was Sherlock Holmes ala Jeremy Brett and that time period of Victorian England.
  • tmgm528tmgm528 Member Posts: 457
    edited January 2014
    richo said:

    if it was Sherlock Holmes ala Jeremy Brett and that time period of Victorian England.

    Woah, Woah Let's not get too ahead of ourselves :P Actually it would be nice to see some more Victorian era stuff but I would love to see a modern 221b.
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543
    edited January 2014
    The looming shadow of a possible GB set actually made me avoid 10197, hoping TLG had some common sense. (No, i don't know what came over me... I must have been mad).

    If TLG considered GB as a potential reality, then the discussion should have been:

    * Doing a GB station, then EOL firebrigade to avoid cannibalised sales.

    * Not doing a GB station, then retain Firebrigade to cross-pollinate & capitalise on each others sales.

    Doing GB and having no station available? Utterly utterly moronic, and a missed opportunity. So many potential newcomers to the modulars lost, for whom GBs might have proved the gateway in. Example: If you like this (GBs), have you considered this (firebrigade). Bang, another modular collector.

    I had hoped (with GB in the review) that TLG would have had the bl**dy sense to keep 10197 available if GB was about to become a reality, OR EOL ahead of a new station befitting a GB release.

    (fingers now crossed for the latter).
    TXLegoguy
  • PaperballparkPaperballpark Member Posts: 4,260
    edited January 2014
    ^ and what if the Ecto1 is too wide to fit into the Fire Brigade set?

    Seriously, it had already been out for 5 years. It would have been daft to keep it going another year. Besides, it looks nothing like the GB station.

    I've not got the BTTF set yet (probably will at some point), but I'll definitely be getting this.
  • bricktuarybricktuary Member Posts: 986
    Meh. A car and minifigs? Not interested.

    Shame about Land Rover, I thought that was a great model.
  • TXLegoguyTXLegoguy Member Posts: 125
    I really hope they make the GB station also.
  • cheshirecatcheshirecat Member Posts: 5,331
    edited January 2014
    I'm really glad they left the building out actually. It would have whacked up the cost on a licensed set and for me added little, perhaps made me not buy even. The figs and car is great, if they could add in a few spare stickers to use in our own moc buildings then perfect.

    Might have to get my still unopened FB out and start working on a nicely detailed moc.
    Yellowcastle
  • AdeelZubairAdeelZubair Member Posts: 2,703
    WHAT JUST THE CAR. DAMN!!
    TXLegoguy
  • tmgm528tmgm528 Member Posts: 457
    Why are people mad it's only the car? O.o I see multiple reasons why it should just be the car.
    1. This is cuusoo, not a full theme a single set so how about we choose the most iconic thing from Ghostbusters
    2. Keeping the cost down, Imagine how expensive this would be with a good looking building too
    3. Lego is meant for kids too, A car with a lower price range and more vrooming to be had will make it a better sell to kids too.
    While there HQ would have been nice I don't mind that it's just the car at all
    dougtsLostInTranslationPaperballparkcheshirecatYellowcastle
  • TheLoneTensorTheLoneTensor Member Posts: 3,937
    Apparently Cuusoo doesn't like any set that's above the $35 mark.
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543
    edited January 2014

    and what if the Ecto1 is too wide to fit into the Fire Brigade set?
    Seriously, it had already been out for 5 years. It would have been daft to keep it going another year. Besides, it looks nothing like the GB station.

    As i said, my preference is for a GB-specific station. But if there is to be no GB station, then for the sake of one more year, brigade would've been an excellent starting point to customise/build from for any new fans to lego.

    We'll just have to disagree that it looks nothing like GBHQ (i think it has merit as a starting point), and as said, the cross-over generated from GB fans would have been highly beneficial to TLG.

    One of the major points of anything like Ghostbusters, is the potential to act as an entry point for lots of new fans. (TLG will always be looking to attract new money into their brand).

    The film fan picks up lego Ghostbusters (their first set in years if not ever), and their first natural thought 'Wouldn't it be cool if there was a station...'. They see 'firebrigade', think 'that might work'. They buy it, enjoy it, (customised or not, as they feel necessary). Then they check out other modulars. Suddenly from never bought lego/thinking its for kids, TLG acquire a brand new modular fan. And we all know how slippery the slope.

    Well, it's no skin off my nose either way. I just reckon it would've made sense to have that modular around at the same time if there isn't to be a GBHQ.

    I guarantee this much: Resellers who hoarded brigades are praying there will be no GBHQ, as that stock will skyrocket once GBs hit the shelves.
    tmgm528TXLegoguy
  • margotmargot Member Posts: 2,308
    Nice that they keep making these AFOL friendly sets. My son was a ghostbuster for Halloween and very few of the kids knew what a Ghostbuster was. I won't say who dressed up as the Stay Puft marshmallow but I will say that most kids thought it was the Michelin man.
    YellowcastleStormKitty
  • joel4motionjoel4motion Member Posts: 959
    Will £35/$40 cover what needs to be a 4 minifig friendly car, and an Ecto done well?
    It would be a shame to cut the station out of the set then go all cheap on the rest of the set to keep under the "ceiling" price of a cuusoo set. I would rather see a £130-150 set done well than a £40 GB equivalent of the BTTF DeLorean.
    legomattTXLegoguyvitreolum
  • CCCCCC Member Posts: 20,526

    I'm really glad they left the building out actually. It would have whacked up the cost on a licensed set and for me added little, perhaps made me not buy even. The figs and car is great, if they could add in a few spare stickers to use in our own moc buildings then perfect.

    Might have to get my still unopened FB out and start working on a nicely detailed moc.

    I'm hoping for printed parts, not stickers.
    legomattTheBrickLaddvitreolum
  • BeavBeav Member Posts: 303
    YEAAAHHHH. Didn't expect them to do the whole fire station if they picked a Ghostbusters set, so I'm totally happy with this.

    Absolutely can't wait. I liked the look of the female minifig line too, and the Japanese architecture set that's up for next review looks brilliant.
  • PaperballparkPaperballpark Member Posts: 4,260
    I have to say, I've just seen the video, and I'm afraid the Lego really wasn't what I was concentrating on...
    chrisdojolordzarak
  • GIR3691GIR3691 Member Posts: 674
    I already built a custom Ecto-1, so I'll just be buying it for the minifigs and printed elements just like I did for the DeLorean.

    I'm fine that they're not making the station. That's easy enough to MOC.
  • Steve_J_OMSteve_J_OM Member Posts: 993
    I, too, am happy that it is just vehicle and minifigs. It will sit very nicely alongside the DeLorean. Though, like others, I hope it is a better model. Cannot wait!
  • CrowkillersCrowkillers Member Posts: 757
    Knowing Cuusoo's history of what they released, I wasn't expecting a firehouse, nor did I support it in ever hopes of getting one...
  • scrumperscrumper Member Posts: 317

    I have to say, I've just seen the video, and I'm afraid the Lego really wasn't what I was concentrating on...

    No, neither was I...her pronunciation of LEGO!...;-)
  • Lego91Lego91 Member Posts: 86

    I have to say, I've just seen the video, and I'm afraid the Lego really wasn't what I was concentrating on...

    Me too! Damn she is hot. (I have no idea what Ghostbuster is, so I won't buy it. But the female minifigures would be great!)
  • LegoboyLegoboy Member Posts: 8,825
    CCC said:

    I'm really glad they left the building out actually. It would have whacked up the cost on a licensed set and for me added little, perhaps made me not buy even. The figs and car is great, if they could add in a few spare stickers to use in our own moc buildings then perfect.

    Might have to get my still unopened FB out and start working on a nicely detailed moc.

    I'm hoping for printed parts, not stickers.
    I'm hoping for printed parts spelt right.
    TheBrickLaddTheLoneTensorBuriedinBricksStormKittyAdeelZubairRomanticWarrior
  • cody6268cody6268 Member Posts: 298
    edited January 2014
    I will probably be converting the Ecto-1 into the correct 1960's S&S or Miller-Meteor ambulance that it was based on. I would have liked to see the station as it actually is an FDNY station, and I'd probably convert it into a fire station and build a Hook and Ladder 8.
    scottwb2010
  • PaperballparkPaperballpark Member Posts: 4,260
    scrumper said:

    I have to say, I've just seen the video, and I'm afraid the Lego really wasn't what I was concentrating on...

    No, neither was I...her pronunciation of LEGO!...;-)
    To be honest, it was more the way she occasionally wiggled that got me... damn!
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543

    Really? I'm sure she's a lovely person and I have no wish to offend, but if we're passing comment on our impressions of the presenter, (whilst doing a very good job) I thought she looked a bit like the child of hermione grainger and luke skywalker... You may think that's a good thing, or you might not. I'm saying nothing. But you watch and tell me you can't see RotJ Mark Hamill.
    :o)
  • jediami65jediami65 Member Posts: 474
    She looks like Emma Watson to me..
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543

    Don't forget:

    image
    LegoManiacc
  • TheLoneTensorTheLoneTensor Member Posts: 3,937
    I think it's more about the little swing thing she does with her hips, it's quite distracting indeed. I should sheild my eyes in the future.
  • BrickDancerBrickDancer Member Posts: 3,639
    ^It's kinda like that Bieber and Miley Cyrus effect isn't it?
  • SilentModeSilentMode Member Posts: 586
    This could be a hot CUUSOO set!
  • OdinduskOdindusk Member Posts: 763
    They should be forthcoming about a perceived price point that designers need to be mindful of, if they know that they're never going to approve a "large" set. Would save some people a lot of time and disappointment.

    Do you guys think this is possibly the case? Or has it just happened to be that no large set has been suitable thus far?
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543
    edited January 2014
    ^ Valid point. I also thought from the video that there was a definite between-the-lines type message, something like 'the design team are working hard to simplify down to our happy profit margin while retaining mid-price range'.

    It's one of the things that bugs me right now with TLG. They decide on a price point first, target audience second, design last... and that decision then carries over onto the next thing, and the next, and the next, even though the strategy no longer applies (and might even damage sales).

    I'm with Ben Kenobi on this one: occasionally a set deserves a more sophisticated build for a more civilised age (of FOL).
  • 12651265 Member Posts: 1,142
    Glad to see that Lego rewarded the better of the two Ghostbusters' sets than trying to be PC by paying tribute to both builds. The better set prevailed.
  • legomattlegomatt Member Posts: 2,543
    edited January 2014
    ^ Yes. Except by the time they've finished with it, will we notice? Lol ;oP
  • BRCBRC Member Posts: 125
    What, no Ghostbusters headquarters just the car and figures, erghhhh.
  • mrfootballmrfootball Member Posts: 84
    If the Ghostbuster car looks anything like the Cuusoo model, I'll definitely buy. Looks awesome. Loved the theme.
  • CCCCCC Member Posts: 20,526
    Legoboy said:

    CCC said:

    I'm really glad they left the building out actually. It would have whacked up the cost on a licensed set and for me added little, perhaps made me not buy even. The figs and car is great, if they could add in a few spare stickers to use in our own moc buildings then perfect.

    Might have to get my still unopened FB out and start working on a nicely detailed moc.

    I'm hoping for printed parts, not stickers.
    I'm hoping for printed parts spelt right.
    When they make mistakes it is buy one (part) get one (part) free. So I'm on the fence.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Shopping at LEGO.com or Amazon?

Please use our links: LEGO.com Amazon

Recent discussions Categories Privacy Policy Brickset.com

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.