Please use our links: LEGO.com • Amazon
Recent discussions • Categories • Privacy Policy • Brickset.com
Brickset.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, the Amazon.com.ca, Inc. Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, which are affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comments
I'm not an expert on these matters, so that is why I posted this for discussion :)
I'm getting into the habit of doing 600 dpi scans of sticker sheets when I crack open a set; it'd be nice to have a repository to systematically collect everybody's scans together.
Agree that from a copyright perspective it doesn't seem any different to posting instructions; on this basis, providing no money changes hands it's hard to see LEGO objecting.
The instructions argument seems pretty strong to me. They appear to have let that go and however i try I can't differentiate between the two. Stickers include images that belong to the Lucas, marvel, DC etc, but then so do the instructions.
I suspect if you asked LEGO they would say no. If you went ahead and did it, they might not notice/not care.
Now if someone was trying to sell these for dear then I could see an issue.
But if the scans were available for people to print out on their own I do not see it being an issue (nevermind I have yet to see a repro that was perfect scale to the original)
I cannot tell you how long I have been looking for repro 1592 stickers sheets after missing them back when a guy was selling them on eBay.
I tihnk if you are simply doing old LEGO sheets that is likely not an issue, especially if not made for the last 10-20 years (though Im guessing that any website should verify this with LEGO before actively allowing posts) but the licensed ones, particularly SW, will likely run into a brick wall.
Having a repository on Brickset.com is one thing, but I wanted to keep it within the forum and just have a thread where we can exchange scans. If you can add it to the website; that would be even better.
http://www.bricksetforum.com/discussion/comment/219109#Comment_219109
If anyone does have a scan, I'd be grateful for a copy.
It would be really good to have this automated, especially if everyone submitting them agrees to a standard for uploads (high-res, and aligned correctly on your scanner first not at some jaunty angle!)
That said, I have also been doing 600dpi scans on any new sticker sheets since about 2010. Fair use should protect your right to do this, which lets you have a personal copy as a backup in case your originals get ruined--which happens naturally over time.
To take a different angle, anyone know if there's a specific type of paper/glue combo one should use when re-printing stickers? I scanned and remastered in Photoshop several of my UCS discription placards but not sure what to re-print them on.
One more thing to consider--color is critical since often, the sticker color needs to match a part color. If there were to be a standard, uploads would need to be in a high-quality format, with some kind of color profile attached to the image. I'm not so sure a simple vollunteer-based catalog of user scans would work, but it's certainly better than nothing.
As far as paper, color, scale and dpi quality; that can be discussed as well, but maybe not in another thread.
There are lots of analogous situations I think most anyone can think of... for example, YouTube perennially having to monitor and remove audio, and so on, from infringing clips. Also photography on the net. Also pirated books (a real problem in the origami community). And so on.
Those of you who collect music may well have noticed a general decline in availability of high-quality cover scans in recent years. This is for the same reason. Even a site like Discogs has to be careful not to overdo the amount and quality of what is available in terms of the scans posted there.
To keep the thread clean it could have the rules that all posts had to be sticker scans only (no thanks, no requests, etc) and the text should only contain the set number and set name.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LEGO-Reproduction-Stickers-Decals-Set-N-s-0-6000-/271391045037?pt=UK_ToysGames_ModelKits_ModelKits_JN&var=&hash=item3f302ab5ad
from sets 0-6000
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LEGO-Reproduction-Stickers-Decals-Set-N-s-6000-/271392275042?pt=UK_ToysGames_ModelKits_ModelKits_JN&var=&hash=item3f303d7a62
from sets 6000+
Never found them before, I guess because I search the titles only for the set numbers.
It appears many have ordered from him in the past, and since paypal transactions are protected, I am going to try to order from them (as I need some stickers, namely 1592, and cannot afford to pay what people on BL are charging for used ones)
Pricey because of the Pound to Dollar conversion but some of these you just cannot find without paying a king's ransom for them.
Has anyone else ordered from this seller?
http://cobrastickers.com/
I have so far only applied stickers to the VW Camper, but I've only been out of the dark ages since May. All other sticker sheets are kept in the building instructions until I get a chance to scan them and print them so I can place the copied ones onto the sets.
While I agree that it would be nice to have a repository for scanned sticker sheets - even if it is members only - , I can also see that it would allow others to reproduce the stickers and sell them at inflated prices without having to do any set-buying or scanning themselves. *all while humming Dire Straights - Money for nothing*
So i guess leaving every one to their own devices may be the best option, but of course this makes it difficult for someone who has bought a used set and wants to replace the stickers.
I'm all for some sort of sticker scan database. And if some Dire Straights-lovin' reseller wants to make replacements using it, that's even better. I'd much rather pay $10-$20 for replacement sheet than $150 or more.
Um... I can't say that I know too much about G.I. Joe, but in that picture of the Conquest you posted, isn't the star on the side upside down?
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/111786518943
That's a great idea that.